March 22, 2006 · Posted in: In the News

Estrada denies receiving kickbacks

(UPDATED) TESTIFYING before the Sandiganbayan today, former President Joseph Estrada denied accusations by Ilocos Sur governor Chavit Singson in 2000 that he received kickbacks of up to P130 million from tobacco excise tax while in office.

During the impeachment trial, Singson said P130 million went straight to Estrada and his family. Singson presented certificates from the Landbank as proof that money went to three persons: Alma Alfaro, Delia Rajas, and Eleuterio Tan.

Singson said it was around the end of August 1998 when the money was withdrawn from the bank by the three persons, as instructed by Charlie “Atong” Ang, a business associate and close friend of Estrada. He said he was at the house of Ang’s mother when he saw bags of money being delivered. He and Singson then proceeded to the house of Estrada in Polk St., Greenhills, Singson recounted, where Ang delivered the money in a “plastic bayong.”

Estrada denied this before the Sandiganbayan this morning, saying there was no way Ang could have entered the premises of his residence since the Presidential Security Group was at that time tightly guarding his home.

Estrada said he never received kickbacks from government deals even when he was still the mayor of San Juan. “Di ako humihingi ng porsyento kaninuman,” he said. Plunder, perjury, and corruption charges were filed against Estrada in April 2001, following a people power revolt that ousted him in January 2001.

Singson, who was instrumental in exposing Estrada’s alleged links to illegal gambling, was at the Sandiganbayan today at the start of Estrada’s testimony.

The trial at the Sandiganbayan this afternoon was suspended as the two parties tried to settle a confusion over documents related to a money transfer from a Landbank branch in Vigan, Ilocos Sur to another branch in Shaw Blvd., Mandaluyong. The court’s documents, compared to those of the prosecution, apparently had different markings.

When asked about his relationship with Singson, Estrada denied the governor’s claim that they have known each other for more than 30 years. In his testimony on July 17, 2000, Singson said he knew Estrada even before he became mayor since his mother, Mary Marcelo Ejercito, was once producer of one of Singson’s films. Estrada said this was “a lie” because his mother has never been a film producer and that she was, in fact, against Estrada’s decision to enter showbiz.

Estrada also said he has never invited Singson to any of his birthday parties. Estrada said he and Singson were never close friends, adding that Singson was an “ordinary friend and a political ally.” A close friend, Estrada said, is someone who could be trusted and loyal. Singson, he said, could not definitely be considered as one.

Estrada thanked the Sandiganbayan for allowing him to testify in court today after five years of court proceedings.

“I feel good because I’ve been waiting for this chance to air my side. I was not able to defend myself in the impeachment trial court,” he said. “I was convicted in the streets.”

The trial started at 8:30 am today, and suspended before noon. As the trial resumed at two o’clock this afternoon, Estrada was expected to answer allegations that he received roughly P545 million in protection money from jueteng operators.

Estrada will again take the stand on March 29.

6 Responses to Estrada denies receiving kickbacks

Avatar

Coffee With Amee » Strategy speculations on Erap taking the stand

March 22nd, 2006 at 4:00 pm

[…] PCIJ reports that Erap denies receiving the kickbacks (obviously he will if he wants to save his sorry ass) and denies being good friends with Chavit Singson (obviously he will after all the shit, excuse my language, that has happened). But wait a minute. Again, I’m no legal expert, but isn’t this denial of things that really happened perjury? But then again, if perjuring himself is enough to tug at heartstrings at this moment in time when the current government is in limbo, wouldn’t the perjury be worth it in the end? […]

Avatar

concerned citizen

March 22nd, 2006 at 4:58 pm

siguro connected si chavit kay erap politically pero personal friend i doubt. sino ba ang mas credible sa dalawa ha? yung self-confessed gambling lord and suspected killer ng isang businessman and few others or si erap na nadeprive magsalita sa public until today sa sandigan bayan. anyway pareho silang not guilty until proven otherwise. kaya lang si erap nakakulong samantalang si chavit ay libre maghasik ng lagim. hehehe. peace!

Avatar

penpenpen88

March 23rd, 2006 at 3:03 pm

anyway pareho silang not guilty until proven otherwise. kaya lang si erap nakakulong samantalang si chavit ay libre maghasik ng lagim. hehehe. peace!
— how true… just goes to show you that the silent majority does favor yung mabagsik na criminls over yung mejo criminals lang hehehe

Avatar

aus_phil

March 24th, 2006 at 10:47 am

It is inconceivable how three person would have been paid in check of 130 million pesos? Perhaps there was only one signatory who is in cahoot with Mr. Estrada but how could this happen when normally more signatories are required? How such huge sums passed for payment by the agency that handles the excise tax. It is inconceivable that if it was a kickback, why pay in checks? Anyway, it is also possible because during the last few years of the regime of Saddam Hussein, he was able to skimmed kickbacks of foreign government that sold food for oil sanction by the United Nations by creating dummy companies such as a trucking company that were paid for its “ghost trucking” services, in reality a kickback for wheat supplied by the Australian Wheat Board.

I wonder who are those three personalities mentioned by Gov. Singson?

Nothing is, however, impossible in a corrupt society or regime! You just stretch one’s imagination and easy money!

Avatar

penpenpen88

March 24th, 2006 at 3:11 pm

and were just talking bout one year here folks .. panu na yung ibang mga taon..wala bang kickbacks then? impossible naman na isang taon lang me tabbaco excise tax di ba? sinu kaya nakinabang nung preceeding at succeeding years? and bakit lang nag iinvestigate nito..at ke chavit? takot kya mga reporters to delve deep into this warlord juetenglords secrets at the risk of their lives and limbs?? hmmmm.. when will we know bout his corruption PCIJ??

Avatar

naykika

March 27th, 2006 at 5:45 am

Why reporters and journalists? As far as investigative reporting, I believe they (journalist and reporters) had already done more than their share of exposing the corruptions and most official wrongdoings by high Government Officials and Public servants and their accomplices in private sectors. Now it’s time for the Proper Authorities that really count to take over-that is the Police Authorities. I believe that how the process works and not only putting the lives of defenseless journalists on the line, they are the people that has the power to do the proper investigations, file the proper charges in the proper court of law and start from there. It may sound simplistic, but make it more complicated and you are not going anywhere.. again just my thoughts.

Comment Form