November 29, 2006 · Posted in: Governance, In the News
Profiling the Chief Justice candidates
BARRING last-minute hitches, the first-ever public interview of the candidates for the next Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will push through as scheduled this afternoon, providing Filipinos for the first time a glimpse of what retiring Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban emphasized as the essential attributes of a magistrate — intelligence, integrity, independence and industry.
UPDATE: Justices are not attending today’s interview, according to this breaking report.
The Supreme Court Appointment Watch (SCAW), a consortium of civil society organizations that has been clamoring for the conduct of public interviews in the selection of Chief Justice, hailed the decision of the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) as a triumph for transparency and accountability.
SCAW maintained that the interviews are the only way by which the people could exercise their right to information on the judiciary selection and appointment process. “These can help bring out the truth on the candidates’ integrity and independence,” said lawyer Marlon Manuel, convenor of the Alternative Law Groups (ALG), a member-organization of SCAW.
Yesterday, the consortium also presented to the media its research findings on the Chief Justice hopefuls, which include the five most senior SC justices — Reynato Puno, Leonardo Quisumbing, Consuelo Ynares-Santiago, Angelina Sandoval-Gutierrez, and Antonio Carpio — and Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago.
SCAW’s research focused on three areas: the government positions previously held by the candidates, their decisions and positions on key national issues, as well as on threats to civil, political and human rights under the Macapagal-Arroyo administration.
Government positions held
Puno is the most senior among the associate justices, having been appointed to the Supreme Court by former President Fidel Ramos on June 28, 1993. He will retire on May 17, 2010. Before his SC appointment, Puno held government positions in both the executive and judiciary branches, serving under the Marcos administration from 1971 to 1984.
REYNATO S. PUNO
|
||
YEAR
|
POSITION
|
PRESIDENTIAL TERM
|
1993
|
Associate Justice, Supreme Court
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1986
|
Justice, Court of Appeals
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1984
|
Acting Chair, Board of Pardons and Parole
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1984
|
Deputy Minister of Justice
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1983
|
Appellate Justice
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1980
|
Associate Justice
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1974
|
Assistant Solicitor
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1972
|
Acting Judge
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1971
|
Solicitor
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
Quisumbing is the second most senior justice. A Ramos appointee like Puno, he was appointed to the Supreme Court on July 15, 1998 and will retire on November 6, 2009. Quisumbing held nine government positions in the executive branch before becoming associate justice. He served under three administrations — Ferdinand Marcos (1965 to 1986), Corazon Aquino (1986 to 1992) and Ramos (1993 to 1998).
LEONARDO A. QUISUMBING
|
||
YEAR
|
POSITION
|
PRESIDENTIAL TERM
|
1998
|
Associate Justice, Supreme Court
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1996
|
Secretary, Department of Labor
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1995
|
OIC, Office of the Executive Secretary
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1994
|
Acting Executive Secretary
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1993-1996
|
Senior Deputy Executive Secretary
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1987-1992
|
Undersecretary, Department of National Defense
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1986-1987
|
Minister of National Defense
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1969
|
Assistant State Counsel, Ministry of Justice
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1965
|
Technical Assistant to the Executive Secretary
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
The third most senior justice, Ynares-Santiago was appointed to the SC by former President Joseph Estrada on April 6, 1999 and will retire on October 6, 2009. Save for her work with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the woman justice served the government primarily with the judiciary branch before becoming associate justice.
CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGO
|
||
YEAR
|
POSITION
|
PRESIDENTIAL TERM
|
1999
|
Associate Justice, Supreme Court
|
Joseph Estrada
|
1990-1998
|
Associate Justice, Court of Appeals
|
Corazon Aquino, Fidel Ramos, Joseph Estrada
|
1973-1990
|
Judge
|
Ferdinand Marcos, Corazon Aquino
|
1968-1973
|
Legal Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
Sandoval-Gutierrez, the fourth most senior justice, is also an Estrada appointee. She was named associate justice on December 22, 2000 and will retire on February 28, 2008. Previously, she held two government positions in the executive branch and six in the judicial branch. Among the candidates, she served under the Marcos administration the longest, from 1965 to 1983.
ANGELINA SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ
|
||
YEAR
|
POSITION
|
PRESIDENTIAL TERM
|
2000
|
Associate Justice, Supreme Court
|
Joseph Estrada
|
1991-2000
|
Associate Justice, Court of Appeals
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1979-1983
|
Assistant Chief of Division, Supreme Court
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1974-1979
|
Associate Attorney, Supreme Court
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1968-1973
|
Judicial Supervisor
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1965-1968
|
Legal Researcher, Department of Justice
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1963-1965
|
Legal Aide, Bureau of Investigation
|
Diosdado Macapagal
|
Carpio is the least senior among the justices vying for the Chief Justice position, having been appointed by Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo only on October 26, 2001. He will retire on October 26, 2019. Carpio served the government mainly with the executive branch, working longest under the Ramos administration.
ANTONIO T. CARPIO
|
||
YEAR
|
POSITION
|
PRESIDENTIAL TERM
|
2001
|
Associate Justice, Supreme Court
|
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
|
1993-1998
|
Member, Board of Regents, University of the Philippines
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1992-1997
|
Chief Presidential Legal Counsel
|
Fidel Ramos
|
1980-1981
|
Special Representative, Department of Trade
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1978-1979
|
Member, Technology Transfer Board, Department of Industry
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
Defensor-Santiago, an incumbent senator, is the only candidate that has served in all three branches of the government. She worked in the judiciary for five years, the executive branch under the Aquino administration for three years, the legislative branch as senator for eight years.
MIRIAM DEFENSOR-SANTIAGO
|
||
YEAR
|
POSITION
|
PRESIDENTIAL TERM
|
2004-present
|
Senator
|
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
|
1995-2001
|
Senator
|
Joseph Estrada
|
1988-1991
|
Member, Board of Directors, Public Estates Authority
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1989
|
Secretary, Department of Agrarian Reform
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1989
|
Member, Board of Directors, Land Bank of the Philippines
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1988-1989
|
Commissioner, Bureau of Immigration and Deportation
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1988-1989
|
Member, Board of Directors, Philippine Retirement Authority
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1988-1989
|
Member, Board of Directors, Ninoy Aquino International Airport
|
Corazon Aquino
|
1983-1987
|
Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court, Quezon City
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
1970-1980
|
Special Assistant to the Secretary, Ministry of Justice
|
Ferdinand Marcos
|
(Next: The candidates’ decisions and positions on key national issues)
2 Responses to Profiling the Chief Justice candidates
INSIDE PCIJ » 5 Chief Justice candidates snub public interview
November 29th, 2006 at 6:41 pm
[…] ONLY one Chief Justice candidate attended the public interview this afternoon. […]
Leo
December 8th, 2006 at 2:02 pm
Lahat ng mga kandidatong SCJ ay pawang magagaling, nahasa ng matagal nilang pagsusunog ng kilay at pagpapakadalubhasa sa pagpapatupad ng batas. Subalit hindi pa rin maisasantabi na sila ay tao pa rin. May puso, at may mga kahinaan din. 5 taon akong nagtrabaho bilang assistant to the managing director ng isang law firm. Ex municipal judge ang amo ko at ako ang alalay niya sa lahat ng kanyang mga lakad mapa korte man o sa ibang bagay. At mula dito ay nakita ng dalawang mata ko at narinig ng dalawang tenga ko kung paano umiikot ang buhay ng mga nasa linya ng batas. Nasa likod lang ako nagmamasid, nakikinig, at kunway hindi naiintindihan ang kanilang pinag-uusapan, patay malisya kung baga. Isa ang matingkad na natutunan ko sa pagmamasid sa kanila, yung companero o pagkilala sa isat isa. Mula dito ay dalawang bagay ang patuloy at patuloy nilang pinag-aaralan. Una, kung paano niya ilalapat ang hatol na magkakaroon ng pagkakataon ang companero niyang humihingi ng pabor para sa kabilang panig na hindi lalabas na magkakilala sila at ikalawa kung paano niya patutunayan sa sambayanan na wasto at tumpak ang kanyang naging hatol na hindi magkakaroon ng bahid ng pag-aalinlangan upang mapanatili na malinis ang ating huridikatura.Napakahirap… Pag narinig ko na sa bibig ng amo ko ang mga katagang ” itong si panyero talaga, oo” alam ko ng napakabigat ng kanyang problema… Ang batas ay patuloy at patuloy na maipatutupad subalit sa likod nito naroon ang masakit at napakahirap na katayuan ng mga huwes upang makahatol ng naaayon sa ating saligang batas.Si Puno man. o si Quisumbing o si Miriam ang maupo bilang SCJ ang buhay ng mga Pilipino ay magpapatuloy sapagkat ang buhay ay hindi ang Supreme Court.