February 25, 2007 · Posted in: Edsa Special, i Report Features

Edsa: 1986 and beyond

TODAY, as we again commit to memory the fourth and final day of that one singular event 21 years ago that brought Filipinos together on a strip of highway and showed them their potential for greatness, the PCIJ makes available the feature stories that we published in i Report‘s special issue on the 20th anniversary of the first edition of People Power last year.

Remembering EdsaThe stories are about 20 Filipinos, some of whom were main players at Edsa, but many of whom were ordinary individuals who led extraordinary lives and made brave choices before and after 1986. They were chosen because of their interesting and important stories — all threads of a complex tapestry, all parts of a broader pattern.

These stories also serve as companion readings to our podcast interviews on our chosen 20 Edsa personalities.

  • Fidel V. Ramos
    ‘The people are tired of constant political bickering’
  • Juan Ponce Enrile
    ‘Our leaders are more preoccupied with appearing popular and democratic without doing the reforms’

  • Nur Misuari
    ‘Without justice, there can never be an end to the war in Mindanao’
  • Romeo J. Intengan
    ‘People power practiced too often sends a message abroad that you’re an unstable country’
  • Eugenia Apostol
    ‘It’s not just the leadership that must change. The people, too, must change’
  • Raymundo Jarque
    ‘We returned to democracy, but the practices are undemocratic’

8 Responses to Edsa: 1986 and beyond

Avatar

Scud

February 26th, 2007 at 2:43 am

Ehem..Madam Cory,matagal na po kaming nagsasakripisyo. Kayo po ba? ano po ba ang naisakripisyo ninyo? Pahingi naman ng lupa sa Luisita, kahit lupa sa paso lang!

Avatar

troy

February 26th, 2007 at 1:48 pm

here converges two events, the 21st anniversary of edsa people power revolution and the release of the melo commission report. edsa reminds us of the excesses of the marcos dictatorship. the melo commission exposes the immorality of the present one. one cannot help but compare the corruption, incompetence and injustice of the marcos dictatorship which we rose up against to what we have today.

for a moment in 1985 we felt good as a nation, the world then looked at us with an approving gaze. we were able to stand proud in spite of our dire difficulties. for a moment we were full of hope.

today we fell to a moral low. the image of the president putting decorations on a symbol of the governments disregard for our democratic institutions is an affirmation that the government sees itself as above the rule of law.

we continue to celebrate edsa, but for what do we really celebrate for? edsa now is just a memory of lost opportunities.

Avatar

dimasalang

February 27th, 2007 at 4:09 pm

Edsa is nothing more than a memory…Edsa was never a revolution. For it to be called a revolution, it must be followed by deep reforms in all facets of the society. Economic, Cultural, Political, etc. But all Edsa did was to bring chaos when there was none, to allow the rich keep the poor uneducated, to bring into power corrupt officials, to highlight everything that is rotten in this society and make it the norms. What we are feeling today are the effects and consequences of the events that transpired in Edsa 21 years ago.

For me, it is not right to celebrate something that has not brought anything good for the country.

The Filipino people cannot blame anybody but themselves. For Edsa was the best chance that this country can right itself and create its own identity. After hundreds of years of being colonized and subjugated both by foreigners and local traitors, it was the best opportunity for this race to impose itself and remove these influences. Instead, what did we do? After Marcos fled, we left evrything to the likes of Sin, Cory, Ramos, etc. I think that was the biggest mistake we ever did for, in my opinion, there will never be a second Edsa. There will never be another Edsa, where anything happened in a peaceful manner. Yes, I think there will be another chance, but it will not be like Edsa.

Avatar

Ambuot Saimo

February 28th, 2007 at 1:02 am

To me there is nothing to celebrate for EDSAs are not revolutions of the Filipino people in general but by persons with vested interests to protect and another by “flux”.

EDSA I was by the rich (Makati Business Club gravely affected by the Marcos’ government regulations or “takeovers” during martial law) by using the church (Cardinal Sin) by giving huge “donations”), aided by military (Ramos & Enrile)to protect their imminent firing by Marcos and, supported by suburban people ecstatic about attending “fiesta celebration” in the streets. I believe that at time majority of the poor Filipinos particularly in the provinces support Marcos because of his development programs (many of the big projects today were initiated during his time) and pro-poor stance. Additionally, peace and order reign in the entire nation save in the Muslim Mindanao area only. In Metro Manila, many of the bad guys particularly from the slum areas, jeepney and bus holduppers and “kotong” guys “disappeared” from the streets and you can walk peacefully without looking over your shoulders. Ironically, it was Enrile himself who later said that, “EDSA is not the Philippines and the Philippines is not EDSA” an admission that Marcos was ousted not by majority of the Filipino people but by only a marginal sector of the population. If it’s true he enriched himself it’s not from the peoples’ purse but from other “sources” and that he’s virtually doing it “alone” because he has control over his men. Today, almost every high government offical are simultaneously dipping their hands at Juan De La Cruz’ money with impunity because the “head” cannot control her “body”. Actually, I think a “Marcos” type person is what we need today.

EDSA II is again a farce- a revolution initiated by the “cell phone”. It was the “texting” that brought the people to EDSA. The “Go To EDSA” text was forwarded and forwarded over and over again to as much as so many first time cell phone owners- people excited about using their much coveted toy.

We need a true People’s Revolution for a change and the the sooner the better.

Avatar

kim

February 28th, 2007 at 1:40 am

EDSA is a commemoration of the power of the people. Any leaders should not underestimate the power of it. It’s not just happened in our country but it was even a model for the oppressed democracy in other countries. Therefore it is a lesson that all of us who will oppress again by any leader to stand and fight.

These days the true meaning of EDSA is no longer “worth fighting for”, why? bec. some of us are now allowing to ruin the spirit of it, the real meaning of democracy. We should all remember the tyranny of the past, the will of the people to unite whenever our freedom is at stake. If only for their own prestige, of the few greed leaders then, we will not succeed and move our country forward. We should watch, participate and fight the process of clean and good governance. The problem is that our current leader is again ruining it down. Are we going to wait again until “Juan dela Cruz” feel the pain and succumb to this present anarchy?

Avatar

jr_lad

February 28th, 2007 at 6:06 pm

the spirit and significance of edsa 1 was forever lost due to edsa 2.

Avatar

drhenry4

May 24th, 2007 at 1:00 am

The 1986 “People Power Revolution” is a very remarkable phenomenon, not only throughout the Philippine history, but also with the world history. Nowhere in this planet, in the past centuries, was such similar exercise shown by any nation. It was a thrilling experience, with lots of indescribable emotions. Many were astonished that such a “peaceful” exercise would overthrow a strongman President from his position. Peaceful, meaning no guns were fired to unseat him. The whole stretch of EDSA was filled with festive scenery and moods. None such event was in the country for the past decade due to suppression of martial law. And now given a chance, everybody was enthusiastic to participate in this one-chance-in-a-lifetime event. In fact, many are at EDSA not because they wanted to unseat a strong leader. It was what everybody was doing. It would be very ridiculous to interpret that Filipinos at that time were politically mature, given the setting of oppression of information about national concerns, with some of the events in Philippine history revised to favor the incumbent, opposition leaders being jailed and assassinated, news being reformatted so it would not “destroy the country’s image”. It can be safely deduced that Filipinos at that time were politically naive. But still, it would be unreasonable not to accept the fact that majority of the mood was anti-Marcos, due to slow down of economy in which the common Filipino would feel as increased in prices of basic commodities.

But who were in front of the political stage? Marcos family and cronies dominating the scenes and all the political scripts, vs. their political foes being oppressed, jailed, silenced, and seeking political asylum with the United States (some, after shouting anti-US-Marcos regime in the streets). It was a battle of positions, the anti-US-Marcos regime claiming they were at the side of the masses, while in fact it was their own interests, their properties, business interests and positions they were fighting for. The common Filipino was just watching uninterestingly, not knowing these events affected his living. Campaigns for the coming snap elections were filled with anti-Marcos issues, with the forefront of Benigno Aquino’s assassination, high inflation and unemployment rates, devaluation of peso and increasing poverty. Dominating mood, of course, is the spirit of “antis” as the common Filipino attitude of “kontrabida” prevailed, with economic concerns at stake. Another attitude of “maawain” came, as the widow of the oppressed and assassinated, Ninoy, became the opponent of the strongman for the presidency. Of course, not to forget the position of the late Jaime Cardinal Sin, everything was in favor of the “antis”.

What sparked the spread of the “anti” mood was the obvious manipulation of the result of the election. The Filipino, in his small capacity, would not want his right, his right for suffrage, be trampled down. Still, Filipinos at that time were immature politically and did not know what to do. After the election, the Marcos’ characters in the political stage were replaced by their enemies, and the viewers were enjoying. Not only that Marcos’ characters were replaced, the viewers were encouraged to join the stage and participate with the story. The people enjoying the events, festivities were everywhere, emotions were very high. And the main “antis” were very happy. Their “talent fees” would be paid. They would finally regain their position. The viewers who joined the story would get what? Freedom? This was the word shouted by the “antis” as the “prize” for participating. And the common Filipino accepted it. And that was their mistake.

Who became free? Filipinos? From what? Everybody could buy what he wanted as long as he could afford; no restrictions from the government. Anyone could travel from Batanes to Jolo without interference from the police or the army. Anyone could send their kids to whatever school they wanted, as long as they can pay the tuition fees. What freedom was being talked about? Freedom to criticize the government. That was the freedom the “antis” were after. It was not the concern of the common Filipino. The concern of the common Filipino was economic freedom. Was that given after the so called “People Power Revolution”? Further pages of the history will tell.

Avatar

drhenry4

May 24th, 2007 at 1:25 am

I would like to echo what Enrile said regarding the failure of the EDSA 1986 People Power Revolution.

“It all boils down to leadership. Our leaders are more preoccupied with appearing popular and democratic without doing the reforms.”

Leaders, not only the President but also the Senators and Congressmen, being elected nationally, from 1987 up until now, were accountable for this failure.

Comment Form