March 10, 2008 · Posted in: Governance, In the News

Stirrings over Spratlys

YET to completely extricate itself from the scandal over the scrapped national broadband network deal, the Arroyo government is again entangled in another brewing controversy concerning two agreements the country entered into with China and Vietnam to undertake seismic studies of the Spratly Islands.

Certain areas of the disputed territories in the South China Sea have been the subject of joint marine seismic undertaking (JMSU) agreements — the first signed between the Philippines and China on September 1, 2004 and the second signed between the two countries and Vietnam on March 14, 2005 — to conduct research on their petroleum resource potential as a pre-exploration activity.

spratlys-claims.jpg

View an interactive map of the Spratly Islands courtesy of Middlebury College.

The undertaking covers an area of 142,886 square kilometers (as defined in Annex A of the agreement) for a three-year period. Signatories to the said agreements were the countries’ state-owned oil companies, China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), Philippine National Oil Company (PNOC), and Vietnam Oil and Gas Corporation (PetroVietnam). Vietnam entered the picture after it aired its concern about the earlier pact between China and the Philippines that, based on a recent Far Eastern Economic Review story, was concluded without consultation, and is also against the spirit of the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties signed between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China.

Read the pertinent documents (courtesy of ellentordesillas.com):

Critics have raised the issue of treason against the Arroyo government for the alleged “sellout” of Philippine territory. The allegations are bolstered by a Malaya report today pointing out that the agreements cover 24,000 square kilometers of undisputed Philippine territory including the islands of Patag (Flat), Lawak (Nanshan), Parola (Northeast Cay), Panata (Lankiam Cay), Kota (Loaita), and Likas (West York) based on the coordinates provided in the annex.

The area covered by the agreements, the report added, also encroaches on some 80 percent of the Kalayaan group of islands being claimed by the Philippines, including Spratly Island, just 700 kilometers off Palawan.

AREA COORDINATES AS DEFINED
IN ANNEX A
CORNER
LONGITUDE
LATITUDE
1
118° 00′ 00″
10° 52′ 00″
2
117° 00′ 00″
08° 55′ 00″
3
112° 54′ 00″
08° 55′ 00″
4
112° 54′ 00″
09° 50′ 00″
5
113° 57′ 00″
09° 50′ 00″
6
113° 57′ 00″
11° 10′ 00″
7
114° 32′ 00″
11° 10′ 00″
8
114° 32′ 00″
11° 56′ 00″
9
118° 00′ 00″
11° 56′ 00″

The Spratlys are a group of islands consisting of more than 100 small groups of islands, isles, shoals, banks, atolls, cays, coral reefs and sandbars. The Spratly archipelago, including shallow territorial waters, cover an area of approximately 180,000 square kilometers.

There are claims that the oil and gas potential of South China Sea, including the Spratlys region, is huge. Aside from these natural resources, the Spratlys are also known to be rich fishing grounds. Their strategic importance cannot also be denied as the islands straddle commercially important sea lanes and serve as legal base points from which to project claims of exclusive jurisdiction over waters and resources in the South China Sea.

China, Taiwan, and Vietnam claim the entire Spratly Islands, while Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines claim portions of the disputed area in the South China Sea. Except for Brunei, all the claimants are currently occupying islands or reefs.

Under the tripartite agreement, China, the Philippines, and Vietnam have agreed to temporarily set aside their territorial disputes over the Spratlys so as to transform the South China Sea into an area of cooperation, peace and development.

Allegations that the signing of the said seismic undertaking agreements were made in exchange for official development assistance from China to fund government projects concerning the NBN, cyber education, and railway rehabilitation (North and South Rail) have also surfaced.

But government officials defended the JMSU as being “above board.” The pre-exploration activities, they said, do not violate the Constitution since these do not impinge on Philippine sovereignty and its territorial integrity.

At a press conference this afternoon, Eduardo Mañalac, the former PNOC president and CEO who signed the agreements on behalf of the Philippine government, said that all actions taken under his watch were “above board, technically sound, thoroughly investigated as to its legality, and approved unconditionally by the governments of the three countries involved.”

Mañalac said the JMSU was explicit about not undermining the claims of the three countries on the Spratlys. His experiences before, during, and after the JMSU signing, he added, involved:

  • a sincere effort on the part of three governments to find common ground for cooperation involving the South China Sea area;
  • a desire to materialize this effort in terms of a concrete scientific study the results of which could be of great value in determining over-all consequences for the region; and
  • a common determination to cement the friendships formed by opening further discussions beyond the JMSU.

He, however, said that his personal knowledge of the truth is limited to the agreements’ planning and execution.

6 Responses to Stirrings over Spratlys

Avatar

jemasan1

March 10th, 2008 at 10:15 pm

Wowowie!!!!!!!!!!!!!Wow another scandal again ng GMA government? 2008 is the most controversial year of Gloria & cohorts in this bogus president we had.We,the the people are getting tired to all this appearing anomalous transaction now,wala na tayong pag-asa pa na to recover until GMA’s gone.Sana tamaan ng kidlat ang lahat ng involved sa anomalies sa GMA government.

Spratly,na ipinaglaban ng mga naunang president natin ngayon si GMA lang pala ang babago sa policy ng Philippines tungkol dito.

Avatar

jcc

March 10th, 2008 at 11:34 pm

Not only GMA. I think we also abdicated our rights over Borneo, owned previsously by certain Chieftan/Datu from Mindanao.

But here is the real fact folks and do not be alarmed and accuse me of treason the way you were accusing GMA now. International politics is based on the law of the jungle. If you claim a territory your own, you should be able to defend that territory with all your might. We abdicated our sovereignty over Borneo before because we do not want to commit our troops against Malaysia.

We cannot defend our rights over Spratlys because we would be contending over China, the bigger devil and smaller devils like Vietnam, Brueni and yes Malaysia again.

So we resort to “diplomatic channels” to resolve the issue and came up with the “Seismic Agreement” and “Exploration Undertaking. etc. etc…

Those who do not want the diplomatic channels to work must be prepared to drench the Spratlys with the blood of our soldiers, and it will achieve nothing because China is already overreaching and we do not have the military might to repel this incursion. Our best shot is the diplomatic channels.

Some of our countrymen are anti-American too, but you could have depended on America’s goodwill to exert its influence over China and tell it to leave the Spratlys alone to the Philippines, but the way things are, America will side only with the powerful unless it needs the Philippines to advance its own self-interest too. Do we have that diplomatic card up our sleeves? Diplomacy is the only weapon of the weak, that is why P.I. is resorting to it.

America is composed of millions of miles of acreable and beautiful landscapes because they were able to landgrab them from the Mexicans, from the Spaniards and French in the case of Lousiana, from the native Hawaiians; and during early periods, from the native Indians. America had achieved it through might and not through diplomatic channels.

That is your history lesson folks.

Avatar

ryebosco

March 11th, 2008 at 2:16 pm

Yeap. For now, consider the Philippines very lucky that Communist China is not using its force and might to simply claim the Spratleys. The Philippine Military (so corrupt, no discipline and simply a “for show” force only) stands no chance if it were to go to war against any country. (Heck, the military still asks for second hand weapons and equipments–scraps from the U.S…even asking for help to quell insurgencies like the NPA and Muslims.)

Face it, the Philippines needs the United States. This is a simple problem with a simple solution. Just sell or lease a tiny island off the southern tip of Palawan. Not only will the Philippines earn money from America, the country will also benefit from America’s protection.

Anybody who disagrees and uses the argument, “The Philippines is a sovereign nation; The Philippines will not prostitute to the U.S.; etc. blah blah blah….” please save it. Here’s the deal—THE PHILIPPINES IS POOR/WEAK AND IT STILL DEPENDS ON THE U.S. FOR AID.

As I’ve said before, beware of COMMUNIST CHINA. It may just be a matter of time when COMMUNIST CHINA INVADES THE PHILIPPINES AND BADABING!!!!!!EVERYBODY HAS TO SPEAK CHINESE AND WORK IN SLAVE FACTORIES WHICH NO PEOPLE POWER CAN OVERCOME. Corruption will be the Philippines’ downfall to Communist China. But then again, who really cares if the Philippines is under Chinese rule? What’s the difference? LOL

I say change the name to PHEE LEE PINGS (Communist China’s archipelago and summer destination.) Dang, and Filipinos will be second class citizens and turned into maids by Communist military and business leaders.)

Sheeeeet, I’m out of here.

Avatar

jcc

March 11th, 2008 at 6:34 pm

CORRECTION:

What used to be owned by a Mindanao Chieftain/Datu is the island of Sabah, off north of Borneo and not the entire Borneo itself.

Avatar

Ambuot Saimo

March 13th, 2008 at 5:47 am

Rye,
Ang dahilan kung bakit hindi ma-invade ng China ang Pinas ay hindi dahil sa ating military (na pinamumunuan ng mga heneral na ang allegiance ay hindi sa papel may paunang salitang: “We the Filipino People….” kundi doon sa papel na may nakasulat na: “This Note is a Legal Tender For All Debts Public and Private”). Ang totoo ‘nyan ay takot ang mga Intsik sa lakas ng hangin ng mga Pinoy dahil maaring ilihis ang kanilang mga IBMs, bomba at mga bala pabalik sa kanila. He.. he… he…. Ambot saiyong tanan!!!

Avatar

Dave...

July 24th, 2011 at 9:57 am

Many countries are claiming the Sprat ly Islands. What really matters is if what country is willing to defend these countries if they do go head to head with an all out confrontation over them.

Who will win:

Vietnam
Philippines
Burma
China
Taiwan

China will be the winner because they have the power and money to take that property forever.
It is just like the Malvenas Islands or Faulkland Islands insident in the early 1980’s. It originally belonged to Argentina but because England was a stronger nation it was able to land grab that Island. That incident is also another time bomb ticking. I am sure Argentina will again try to get back those islands from England again in the future.

As for the Sprat Ly Islands, China is vastly more superior in military stength and soon they will have those Islands using brut force to obtain them.

Comment Form