SENATOR-JUDGE MIRIAM DEFENSOR SANTIAGO blew her top and asked the impeachment court to cite private prosecutor Vitaliano Aguirre II for contempt for allegedly disrespecting the court by covering his ears while she was berating the prosecutors.

Senator-Judge Jinggoy Estrada was the first to point out the actions of Atty. Aguirre, who was caught on camera covering his ears during Santiago’s repeated angry outbursts at the prosecution team. At one point, Santiago had even uttered a tagalog invective, that was stricken off the records.

Santiago angrily confronted Aguirre and demanded that the court charge him for contempt.

To this, Aguirre responded by saying that judges should not be lecturing lawyers in the way Santiago was doing to the prosecution.

“This is the first time I experienced in forty years of practice na isang judge maglelecture sa mga abogado. Hindi ata tama ang ganun,” Aguirre told the court.

Aguirre is a part of the team of private prosecutors assisting the House prosecutors in pursuing the impeachment case against Chief Justice Corona. In previous cases, Aguirre had represented several personalities in the Hubert Webb – Carmela Vizconde rape-murder case.

To Aguirre’s response, Santiago again repeated her demand that the court cite Aguirre for contempt. “I reiterate my motion to cite for contempt by the impeachment court. Imagine if all lawyers did that in front of the impeachment court,” Santiago said.

Aguirre told the court that he covered his ears on purpose to make a point. “Kung nakakasakit ang aktwasyon ko, I did it purposely. Totoo na shrill ang voice, at nasasaktan ang tenga ko,” Aguirre said.

“Kahit senador-judges (kayo) at kami ay prosecutors lamang dito, importante ang respeto. Kung you demand respeto, dapat respetuhin mo rin (kami,” Aguirre said, to the surprise of many in the gallery. This was the first time that anyone had confronted Santiago for her many outbursts in the impeachment court.

At one point, Santiago said that Aguirre should have just left the session hall if he did not like what he was hearing. To this, Aguirre responded that he wanted to but could not. Neither could he stand up to object, Aguirre said, because he had not been recognized by the impeachment court.

Before the other Senator-Judges could weigh in, Presiding Officer Juan Ponce Enrile stepped in and suspended the session.

12 Responses to Miriam wants private prosecutor
cited for contempt

Avatar

PEBBLES TAN

February 29th, 2012 at 3:50 pm

nakahanap lang ng katapat si sen santiago. she’s so arrogant kasi.

Avatar

Bene Esse Amarille

February 29th, 2012 at 4:08 pm

Miriam Defensor-Santiago is so arrogant. I don’t know what she thinks of herself. For us, she may be thinking she could not die. Santiago’s highest display of arrogance and unprofessionalism bespeaks of her problematic character. How could she demand respect for herself when she doesn’t respect others. When you become a judge, it doesn’t mean that you are clothed with immunity from good manners and right conduct.

Avatar

Icalian

February 29th, 2012 at 4:28 pm

Law students are trained to always be ready, otherwise they should be prepared to suffer humiliation. The prosecution is just getting what they deserve. They should have thought about the consequences of their actions before doing them.

Avatar

gloria

February 29th, 2012 at 4:38 pm

tama lang ang ginawa mo senador miriam santiago yan ang dapat sa mga katulad niya na walang galang bastos kamuka siya ng amo nila na si pinoy kabagobagong pangulo ay gusto ng maging dictador

Avatar

ethan

February 29th, 2012 at 5:06 pm

There is no reason for miriam to humiliate the prosecution.

If she thinks they are committing blunders then let them be. Weigh the evidence and make a decision. That’s her duty. Why rant and go berzerk?

The problem with miriam is that she is too pre-occupied in trying to convince the public that she is an intellect when it comes to law.

It is only in the Philippines wherein politicians like miriam are allowed to throw their weight around. Try watching C-span whenever a senate hearing is being held in the U.S. The U.S. senators will not even dare to berate or insult any individual appearing before them like miriam. In fact, the invited individuals are given leeway to debate and show disgust to a senator whenever they feel they are being insulted or their rights are being violated.

Avatar

angel

February 29th, 2012 at 6:17 pm

super baliw na talaga si miriam…

Avatar

Mark

February 29th, 2012 at 6:51 pm

Hindi porket nageenglish kayo ay magaling na kayo.. lahat ng nagagalit kay miriam dito ay hindi manlang nag-isip sa kadahilanang galit sila kay corona o kaya ay maka P-noy sila,, TANDAAN NIYO “JUDGE” sila kung nakapagaral po kayo ay hindi po pwede na sagot sagutin niyo ang mga judge.. may mga oras talaga na nasesermonan ang mga lawyers ng mga judge pero kahit kailan ay hindi sila nasagot ng ganun ka bastos.. OO naoffend sila pero kagagawan din nila yun.. kahit siguro naman kung ako ang nasa prosecution ay maoofend ako pero hindi naman siguro ganun kabastos ang sasabihin ko or antics ko sa court na ang mga senators ay mga JUDGE… if they don’t get what they want they will just do some nasty antics like that?.. have you seen the defense panel do that kind of stuff? even if Sen. Judge drillon is doing the job of a prosecutor.. never… kaya kung pwede lang po ay wag tayo padala sa gusto natin at intindihin ng mabuti ang impeachment maging mapanuri po tayo hindi maging “MAKA – MAKA” up to this point wala parin naman nakakalamang or dehado.. dahil hindi pa po tapos ang trial.. march 12 pa ang sunod na trial kaya may chance pa ang prosecution na humanap ng ebidensya,, mahaba habang leeway para sakanila..

Avatar

attyvan

February 29th, 2012 at 7:42 pm

Covering his ears during the tirade of Sen. Miriam was the highest show of disrespect. No judge would ever let that pass, let alone a senator-judge. No lawyer in his right mind would even attempt to show the slightest hint of disapproval when a judge is talking. Atty. Aguirre should have known that, given that he’s been in practice for 40 years. He deserves the citation of contempt that he was slapped with.

Avatar

Rodolfo Alamer

March 1st, 2012 at 6:42 am

Intelligence without humility is never admirable. Please don’t forget that Satan is very intelligent but he never humbles himself before God. It is but right for a human like Aguirre to be antagonized with the display of pride because God designed us to appreciate godly virtues, like humility, gentleness, etc. and never with obnoxious attitudes like pride, arrogance, brutality, etc.

Avatar

Mars Mejilla

March 1st, 2012 at 10:39 am

Bawal na bang mag-emote kahit dinuduro ka. Yan ang hirap sa atin, naging senadora ka lang parang wala nang karapatan yung iba.

Avatar

Princesa Urduja

March 4th, 2012 at 12:55 am

There has been a continuous fiery discussion on every public forum regarding the latest Corona Impeachment Trial’s hullaballoo when the hypertensive Miriam furiously cussed out at the seemingly incompetent prosecutors, while a desperate private lawyer cupped his ears as silent protest to the Senator-judge’s chronic tirade. Some concurred on how the Lady Senator had berated and insulted the members of prosecution. Others were overjoyed that finally someone had stood up against the boisterous, acid-tongued judge. As both trial lawyers cried “disrespect” at each other, unfortunately, both had exposed the ugly side of law profession on national TV. On legal aspect, most agreed that Atty. Aguirre deserved to be cited for contempt for his misconduct. But while the frustrated lawyer already admitted his fault, apologized (though half-baked), and is being decided on what appropriate penalty should be incurred at him, the extremely ill-tempered Senator so far has not regretted her derogatory remarks nor has been admonished by the Presiding Officer and colleagues for her act of vulgarity. So the question remains – Is Senator Miriam (a public servant who’s designated by the Filipino people to impeachment court as an “honorable” judge) liable to the Code of Judicial Conduct, and thus should be sanctioned for blurting out the offensive word “gago”?

Well for now let’s leave that to the Law experts to decide. But if we’re to use our “right” senses, any rational person would say that using foul language at someone especially in public is unethical. Even a child who’s brought up with proper education thinks that it’s not right to say “bad” words. Even to the point of impatience or desperation, no one is entitled to degrade or humiliate another person. Otherwise, let’s call each other “stupid” and make it legal.

We do understand that both Miriam and Aguirre got emotional that led to their act of misbehaving in public. After all, we are just people with feelings. But neither of them can categorically declare what they did were legally and morally right. I hope people will not just take sides on this issue but instead will incline to the position of “fairness” all the time. Because when we are fair and impartial, only then we can be assured that justice is served.

Lastly, no one can impose “respect” on anyone; for respect is earned.

Avatar

Elis

March 10th, 2012 at 8:35 am

would be great if we could read your blog posts everyday. congrats for the hard work.http://www.comodesbloquearcelular.net

Comment Form