July 28, 2005 · Posted in: In the News

Damage control

PRESIDENT Gloria Arroyo went into damage control mode tonight when she granted GMA-Channel 7’s evening newscast 24 Oras a live interview.

News anchor Mike Enriquez said the network had asked for the interview as far back as July 8 when 10 of her cabinet and sub-cabinet members resigned. But her unannounced appearance on nationwide TV curiously comes a day after the President faced reporters in what turned out to be a disastrous press conference, the first in almost two months that the political crisis has been brewing.

At yesterday’s press conference, members of the Malacañang Press Corps criticized Palace officials for limiting and screening the questions to be asked of the President. The Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines (FOCAP) was also dismayed that all of them were asked to leave the venue, although they had already set up their gear.

On 24 Oras tonight, the President said she was meeting the FOCAP in a separate press conference and that there was little time for her to answer all questions yesterday.

Enriquez got to raise some of those unasked questions:

On whether Comelec Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano was the election official she had asked to "protect her votes," referring to her apology to the nation on June 27, the President said her lawyers advised her not to comment on the matter. She also said she had no information on Garcillano’s whereabouts.

On the possibility of having her term of office cut short:  "I am the duly elected President. My terms ends in 2010. This is my position."

On her reaction to the drop in her ratings in various surveys:  "That’s the presidential system. You have a fixed term. The good thing is you’re able to institute unpopular reforms because that’s the system. And the reforms we’ve been initiating have been unpopular. Add to this severe trial by publicity…."

Her parting shot: "It’s difficult to survive in politics without being tainted. Almost everyone who survives is tainted." Tainted by what, she didn’t say. She merely repeated her mantra: the "answer is a total change in the political system."

30 Responses to Damage control

Avatar

benign0

July 28th, 2005 at 8:28 pm

Change in political system? Sounds like just another political solution that will simply float through the more fundamental issue of the core rot of our society.

Here is what one wise man has to say about these ideas of changing political systems:

“What are or were the essential features of parliamentary government as conceived by Britain?

They are, among others, rule of law, the supremacy of a popularly-elected parliament, collective responsibility of the Cabinet (executive to Parliament) and a tradition of stable, program or policy-oriented political parties (Prof. Olivia Caoili, Legislative and Executive Relations in the Philippines and the Parliamentary Alternatives). Read that again. Stable, policy-oriented or program-oriented political parties. Without such parties as an ideological glue parliamentary government in the Philippines would be a colossal sham.

Do not tell me Lakas-NUCD is such a party, or Laban, or NPC. They are no more political parties in the European parliamentary tradition as a slut crossing herself is the reincarnation of Joan of Arc.

On the contrary, because we do not have such political parties, a parliamentary government in 2004 will be a riot of traditional politicians endlessly vying for power. Who cares for the political doctrine of John Locke or the laissez-faire philosophy of Adam Smith? You have lots of money. You can always buy the majority in Congress – give it a fancy political name – and become prime minister until the next bimbo, with more money than you have, comes along.”

Read all about it here:
http://www.geocities.com/benign0/1-00_intro.html

Political solutions are no good to a society whose fundamental problem involves a rapidly spreading malignant rot in its very soul and character.

Changing political systems in the Philippines will be more like spraying cologne on a rotting corpse.

Happy reading! 😀

Avatar

Garcigwen

July 28th, 2005 at 8:32 pm

I’ll give credit to GMA for not lying when she said : ‘my lawyers advised
me.. blah blah’.

But I’ll take that as a Yes. Thank you.

Avatar

baycas

July 28th, 2005 at 8:56 pm

Exit polls surveys, GMA believes…
Recent SWS and Pulse Asia surveys, believes she does not…

I wonder if there’s a right-minded person who still believes in her?

…Hehehe…hello, Garci? Pakantahin mo naman phone pal mo!

Avatar

noelet

July 28th, 2005 at 11:32 pm

The media blitz et al… it will work for GMA… so what’s our plan? still chanting “RESIGN!” The possibilty is that GMA’s media onslaught could overrun SWS or Pulse surveys. Plus there is Jose Abueva who would campaign for federalism for GMA — an added boost. Plus, even Way Kurat favors federalism for his region.

You see as easily as this… everything keeps turning around in favor of GMA.

Then there’s a misconception reporting a kinder, gentler GMA.

At this point everything Malacanan should at least not be taken at face value. Media should help us elaborate on the programs and dealings inside and outside GMA’s office. O mukha umaalma lang ang media kapag sila na ang tinamaan like yesterday’s presscon.

Help the filipino people shed light to the reality behind that high office.

Avatar

noelet

July 28th, 2005 at 11:50 pm

Garcigwen, its a YES alright.

GMA is complaining of trial-by-publicity. This is a trial-by-publicity and its a fair trial-by-publicity no matter what GMA says. The fact is she can tell the filipino people that she indeed talk to Garcilliano or not. Another fact is that she wants to hide by her lawyer even if she has all the capacity and oppurtunity to deny every allegations… only means she’s a guilty soul.

Hiding in the cloak of constitutionality she awaits her impeachement? or await to block it by buying numbers in congress?

The political maneuvering in congress to try to drop the complaint can be considered UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Pro-GMA would just say its politics.

YOUNG Officers of the New Generation (YOUNG), its time to stage some drastic action. Cha-cha is a form of revolution… its untimely. Then let the YOUNG teach them what a real pro-people revolution is.

To start gather evry evidence of corruption in the military and all link generals and senior officials. Let this be your serving warrant for a true revolution.

If our weakened institution cannot force the law then its the duty of our right-minded to ACT accordingly.

Avatar

bukolitos

July 29th, 2005 at 3:35 am

You are absolutely right Benigno. That’s the way politics is in our country. That’s the reason why GMA and etal spend all those money (people’s) during the election. Now, she wants us to pay for it through EVAT. Maybe they should include in the constitution or pass a law that will disqualify the members of the conass or concon and their immediate family from participating in the future elections. Will JDV and the congressmen still want to join the conass or will they suddenly ask for a concon.

Avatar

michaeljosh

July 29th, 2005 at 3:47 am

In fairness to GMA 7, we really did request for this interview almost a month ago. PERSONALLY I think the reason why it went unannounced was so it would remain exclusive.

Avatar

benign0

July 29th, 2005 at 4:46 am

============
At this point everything Malacanan should at least not be taken at face value. Media should help us elaborate on the programs and dealings inside and outside GMA’s office. O mukha umaalma lang ang media kapag sila na ang tinamaan like yesterday’s presscon.

Help the filipino people shed light to the reality behind that high office.
============

And how do you propose to do that? We’ve already seen here how Pinoys are not really one to critically evaluate information. All they do is pretty much stampede towards whoever makes the loudest noise.

I think those who seem to now fret about the apparent success of GMA’s media blitz are simply getting a taste of their own medicine. Anti-GMA elements engaged in the same tactic as well (which fizzled out when it came to getting people on the streets).

Bottom line is, whatever side one takes, we can see that moving Pinoys is more about getting them to dance rather than getting them to UNDERSTAND the issues.

Avatar

koyobayashi

July 29th, 2005 at 4:50 am

this is the second time [as far as i can tell] PGMA emphasized “It’s difficult to survive in politics without being tainted. Almost everyone who survives is tainted.”… although arguments could be made of this statement, is this a clear admission that she too has succumb to corruption?

Avatar

concerned citizen

July 29th, 2005 at 6:31 am

malinaw na malinaw sagot ni aroyo sa tanong ni mike enriquez di sya aalis ng pwesto till 2010 dahil siya daw ang nanalo sa election. kapal grrr.. di raw sya naniniwala sa surveys para daw popularity contest ang mahalaga daw umuusad economy. huh! d nya masagot ibang tanong pati ba namn sa interview dinidivert ang sagot. kailangan pa ang kanyang mga lawyer kasi baka magsisinungaling na namn buking na naman.may sarileng mundo talaga itong si aroyo. pero halatang tense sya kanina sa mga tanong ni mike enriquez. job well done mr. imbestigador sana ipagpatuloy mo kung talagang wala kayong kinikilingan. media lang talaga makakatulong para makarating sa tao kabuktutan ng gma govt. kaya calling other media entities. wag na yung govt. stations biased talaga yun. akala mo si gma may ari. hoy pera ng tao nagpapandar nbn4, ibc13, rpn 9 di si aroyo. at itong mga broad sheets na ito lalo na philstar ni max soliven. pati mga tabloids halatang mga pro gma. back to gma7 opinion daw ni aroyo mga sagot nya. eh yung mas nakakaraming opinion na magresign. kapit tuko talaga. hinde talaga aalis sa pwesto nya

Avatar

verna

July 29th, 2005 at 9:14 am

Only now do we hear so much debate on charter change. But few people know that the proposal for charter change was presented several years ago by proponents from the provinces, particularly in Mindanao. Columnist Bobit Avila presented well in his column the merits of changing the system of government to Federalism.

A need for system change!
INSIDE CEBU By Bobit S. Avila
The Philippine Star 07/29/2005

I expected that right after the State of the Nation Address (SONA) of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA) we would have started the debate on how we should change our Constitution — via a constitutional convention (con-con) or a constituent assembly (con-ass). Actually, we debated this issue years ago… that despite its huge expense, the con-con was still preferred by many because we don’t trust our congressmen to monkey around with changing our Constitution.

But instead of this debate, we are now hearing people questioning the move for Charter changes, saying the problem is not the form of government, rather the need for moral change. Clearly, a lot of people are totally ignorant of what’s going on around them! If I do not dispute the observation of Lingayen Archbishop Oscar Cruz, it is because he obviously doesn’t know why the present system of government is no longer working. For instance, does he know that the multi-party system has only promoted “personality politics”? Just look at how many political parties have come and gone. What we ought to do is shift to a two-party system… give strength to a political party, not to political animals or political nincompoops!

Does Archbishop Cruz understand that the people in the South are fed up with our colonizers? Four hundred years ago we were colonized by Spain, then the Americans colonized us for 50 years… 50 years later, many of us believe that the rest of the Philippines has become a colony of Metro Manila, and that’s exactly why President Arroyo was applauded when she proposed a shift to a federal system of government as it frees the rest of the country from the bondage of Imperial Manila! Alas, most of our priests do not understand what this means because the Catholic Church isn’t a government and the Vatican’s style of governance isn’t exactly democratic! But I don’t question it.

Perhaps, the good Archbishop doesn’t know that our language policies have caused the suppression or even the extinction of the other languages in this archipelago. Yes, saying that Tagalog is Pilipino and that Cebuano and the other languages are mere dialects of the Pilipino language is a big farce! In truth, Pilipino, as it is spoken today, is really a dialect of Tagalog; after all, Pilipino is 99.9 percent taken from the Tagalog tongue… not the other way!

Thanks to a centralized or unitary form of governance, those in Imperial Manila want everyone to speak their native tongue to the detriment of their own culture! Like it or not, our group, dubbed Save Our Languages through Federalism (SOLFED), and the Internet group called Defenders of Indigenous Languages in the Archipelago (DILA) call this a form of ethnic cleansing! For us, it is only through a federal system of governance that we will best preserve our cultural and ethnic diversity. The truth is no one is really born a Pilipino; he is either an Ilocano, Chavacano, Tagalog, Waray, Ilonggo or Cebuano! Pray, tell me who was born a Filipino?

So there you are. I can present more hard evidence of how bad our system of governance has gone and I will certainly run out of space. So you better believe that our present system of governance is one of the principal causes why this nation has never grown economically and politically. We tend to give too much emphasis on the President… as if the President is a “miracle worker.” But in truth, the President is just another politician lost in the vortex of political accommodations, patronage and greed.

But the reality is the presidency isn’t just the problem here. We’ve also got 24 other headaches… called Senators, who are mini-dictators in their own right, 24 people out of 85 million Filipinos who control billions of pesos in pork barrel! No, my dear Archbishop Cruz, the present system is very much at fault and if you compare our system of governance to the countries that are better than us, believe me it’s a no brainer!

Avatar

P.N. Abinales

July 29th, 2005 at 10:29 am

PCIJ bloggers – sharing with you what was apparently an intense exchange between GMA spokesmen and her opponents at De La Salle U forum yesterday. A professor friend of mine wrote for us the following summary outline (I’ll send them speaker por speaker para hindi masyadong malaki ang file). First the GMA defenders…

Bobi Tiglao, Head, Presidential Management staff

Assessment
• Worked with La Salle statement and debunked the bases for the call (lack of legitimacy, loss of moral ascendancy) for supreme sacrifice-voluntarily relinquishing her position
• Situation brought forth by attempts of mainstream opposition to regain power and of insurgent groups to push protracted struggle
• Middle forces hijacking the move to topple GMA

Stance
Bases for calls for resignation and ouster are weak—President was elected (provided survey and official data that shows GMA won)and should not give up the mandate

GMA should not comment on an admittedly illegally taped conversation, the authenticity of which has not been determined.

Options
GMA continues, political reforms to be instituted through constitutional change

Ricardo Saludo—Deputy Presidential Spokesperson

Assessment
Started by reading his text to resigned cabinet members—sad commentary to our political situation that an elected official is being asked to resign on the basis of illegal recordings and public unrest without any investigation nor formal charges filed, a clamor echoed by former colleagues in the cabinet.

Resignation will exacerbate situation given lack of unity among the forces calling for her resignation or ouster.

Stance
Review the CBCP statement (also presented the Jesuit “Guide to Discernment in a State of Crisis”)

Options
None explicitly stated. GMA continues. Process of securing accountability, impeachment, should be sufficient to determine the truth.

Avatar

P.N. Abinales

July 29th, 2005 at 10:32 am

Now here are the summaries from the anti-GMA panelists

Representative Teddy Casino-Bayan Muna

Assessment
Failed presidency from 2001 to the present—corruption, poverty, cheating, Gloriagate
Fraudulent elections of 2004

Stance
Crisis rooted in prolonged ills of corrupt system, bureaucratic capitalism, semi-feudal, semi-colonial

Options
Transition council—caretaker government to institute the reforms and pave the way for new elections. Immediate tasks of the council

• Investigate electoral fraud in the 2004 elections
• Resume Peace Process
• Uphold liberties
• Solve the fiscal crisis

Chiz Escudero, House Minority Floor Leader

Assessment
Questioned bases for ascendancy of President Arroyo to power (EDSA 2 and May 2004 election)

Stressed that the opposition surfaced the concerns about the May 2004 elections in the Canvassing but such pleas were dismissed

Administration is panicking in the face of actions taken by groups opposed to them that are taken within the ambit of our democratic order

The dichotomy between the economy and politics pictured by the President is mistaken, since the two interact and are part of the established order. There is only one Philippines, with a story that has no ending.

Stance
Opposition has and will always work with established processes in raising issues of impropriety/abuse of power.

Option
Opposing views should be respected, allowed so that our democracy deepens.

Need to put an ending to the winding Philippine story through established institutional process that must not be deterred/prohibited from being operationalized (from impeachment, rallies, and other peaceful forms of action that the administration seems to be fearful of or easily dismiss)

Avatar

P.N. Abinales

July 29th, 2005 at 10:35 am

More anti GMA panelists

Mr. Ronald Llamas, Convenor, Laban ng Masa

Assessment
Past 30 years, 3 major political crisis (1970s old oligarchic control replaced by a government coup; failure of authoritarian regime and people power that was not institutionalized—rejuvenation of elite rule; EDSA Dos-political uprising legitimized as a succession process and was not brought to its logical conclusion)

Major failures of the EDSA 1 successor government—instituting redistributive justice; taking out debt burden, effective management of fiscal resources. Replicated failures/omission of EDSA 2 successor government—business as usual attitude, politicking, GMA in candidate/politician mode and persistent turnaround.

Level of cynicism among the people is constantly increasing. Process of vote count/elections is arguably flawed (evidence in canvass reports where the number of those who voted exceeds those who are registered)

Tapes buttressed the assertion that fraud accompanied 2004 elections handling of PGMA people produced the disbelief/withdrawal of trust.

Stance
Crisis is protracted and solution goes beyond succession given that the crisis is profoundly embedded in system with fundamental deficiencies/defects

Options
Transitional Revolutionary Government

Ms. Karen Tanada, Convenor, Citizens for TRIO

Assessment
Different assessments from their member organizations with the attention concentrated on the Garci tapes and attendant issues of electoral fraud and lost of trust on the President

Stance
Truth commission, Resignation, Impeachment, Ouster—people power

Option
Post-GMA coalition administration that will work on necessary political/electoral/
constitutional reform

Avatar

P.N. Abinales

July 29th, 2005 at 10:37 am

And last but not the least. We’re asking my friend to give us more details on what transpired at the open forum (blow-by-blow account, kung baga). Enjoy!

Mr. Edicio de la Torre, Convenor, Unity for Truth and Justice

Assessment
Hard to simplify, from causal perspective (multiple, mediated, mutual) or values (inner-outer), the current situation. Crisis of whole system that has not been resolved—how could it be fixed/ended/resolved

Can you shake institutions/system to strengthen them? The balance between continuity and change defines the options.

Elections—mediated/manipulated by the contenders and the real results are not known

Stance
Bias for change, but no alternative leader commands acceptance/support

Coalition politics, as an ideal, should be the central thrust of groups (educators, civil society groups)

Out of the box solutions, problems could not be solved with the same process of thinking that created them

Option
Caretaker Council—composition and process of decision making as well as agenda (minimalist/maximal) to be consensually arrived at but importance draws from the need to address cynicism towards current leaders and system. Possible mediating Opposition coalition to usher in caretaker council [?] Value formation, bi-millennial project

Avatar

P.N. Abinales

July 29th, 2005 at 11:00 am

Finalmente, here was some of the blow-by-blow accounts during the open forum. My friend is a Star Wars fan, so pardon the interlacing of the debate with Star War-ish lingo and symbolisms…

Here goes: “The Sith Lord Tiglao was definitely paranoid. The forum was meant to have all groups address two questions—their assessment /characterization of the crisis and their proposed interventions to resolve it. The Sith Lord was definitely not briefed by his staff since his presentation basically rebuked what he understood as the main points in the La Salle Statement that came out on the first Sunday of July. He kept on quoting Winnie Monsod who spoke in her column about mob rule and how PGMA convincingly won the elections. There were about seven slides (will send this to all next week) that simply worked with Winnie’s arguments. As he discussed the arguments, two of his staff started to distribute photocopies of Winnie’s PDI article. He spoke of an orchestrated attempt of the opposition to depose a legitimate president. He said that the Garci tapes did not contain anything incriminating, just Garcia talking to his wife, etc. He ended his presentation with pictures of the rally in Makati and with the argument that there were more red flags and that the left is now taking advantage of the situation.

“The Sith Lord was followed by Sidious Saludo who brandished a copy of a Jesuit statement entitled “Discernment in a time of crisis.” Three pages in length, the Jesuit statement in three-fold was accompanied by the CBCP statement, printed on the other side of the three fold document. He claims that the Jesuit statement, unlike the La Salle statement, was more in keeping with what the Bishops said and kept on saying that the Bishops favored a truth commission and an impeachment. I was asking for a copy of the Jesuit statement and Sidious Saludo promised but left without giving me his copy.

“From the dark side, the less murky or brighter side (depending on one’s persuasion), followed. Teddy Casino, Chiz Escudero, Ronald Llamas, Karen Tanada, and Ed de la Torre. Two clarificatory sessions were held in between the two sets of presentations and among the questions, one directed at the Sith Lord and Sidious got quite an entertaining response from the Sith Lord. They were asked—Where is Garci? The reply of the defense team of the beleaguered Queen hobbit was that it is not their business to search for him. As much as they could not find Ka Roger (the Rabbit not Rosal), they are also clueless as to where Garci is and it is not their business since he is not a government official.

“Towards the end of the morning session, the Sith Lord publicly stated that he felt he was set up by the La Salle Brothers for he was up against anti-GMA forces and the afternoon participants (the afternoon session was a dialogue facilitated by Sheila of PCIJ) were also all anti-GMA. As he was about to leave, he asked one of our staff to call the provincial of the Brothers, Br. Dodo Fernandez, so that he could reiterate his sentiment that he was set up. I saw him conversing with Br Dodo outside so I rushed out.

“I caught up with him as he was about to enter his Patrol, formally introduced myself (I do not know the guy personally except at the time that we were corresponding for the Cebu conference he failed to attend) and explained to him that there was no set up, that the problem was that his staff didn’t respond to the invitation issued early last week until last Wednesday (July 28), that we accommodated his late request to invite Saludo and Salceda even when such came in at 4 pm of Wednesday, that he was not briefed properly about the purpose of the forum, and that even if there were more anti-GMA groups, he should know that they do not necessarily sing the same tune nor converse/conspire with each other. He didn’t give a response but I did notice a stern look from one of his body guards.

“[The] Sith Lord survived the onslaught of the divided rebel forces. He did so by default for he left just before the dialogue started and gave the responsibility of defending his Queen to Darth Sidious Saludo.

Avatar

benign0

July 29th, 2005 at 11:02 am

This one is my favourite:

“problems could not be solved with the same process of thinking that created them” 😉

Avatar

gangster_roger

July 29th, 2005 at 12:39 pm

There is just no way she will be removed from power by constitutional means. The constitutions is protecting the admininistration!

We are a presidential system. Elections are strictly scheduled and the only way to remove the president; in effect to un-elect the president; is via impeachment. That was expained somewhere in this blog.

If we were a parliament a new election is just a matter of course. No need for investigation. Just perceived shortcomings and the ball starts rolling.

Avatar

gangster_roger

July 29th, 2005 at 12:41 pm

Now if the opposition wants the constitution unchanged its because they want the same machinery for themselves!

Avatar

johnmarzan

July 29th, 2005 at 1:50 pm

Enriquez got to raise some of those unasked questions:

On whether Comelec Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano was the election official she had asked to “protect her votes,” referring to her apology to the nation on June 27, the President said her lawyers advised her not to comment on the matter. She also said she had no information on Garcillano’s whereabouts.

On the possibility of having her term of office cut short: “I am the duly elected President. My terms ends in 2010. This is my position.”

On her reaction to the drop in her ratings in various surveys: “That’s the presidential system. You have a fixed term. The good thing is you’re able to institute unpopular reforms because that’s the system. And the reforms we’ve been initiating have been unpopular. Add to this severe trial by publicity….”

I think what GMA’s Press Office did was to collect some of the difficult questions from the reporters that GMA may not be able to answer during the “press conference” (kasi Arroyo was not yet prepared to answer it and they don’t want any gaffes during the press conference), let their lawyers and spinmasters go over the list of questions, and provide GMA with the “prepared answers” the following day.

Then they called a pro-arroyo GMA7 “”journalist like Mike Enriquez to do the “interview” with Arroyo.

He now gets to “ask the questions that Arroyo refused to answer during the live “press conference”, and GMA parrots the “scripted answers” that her lawyers provided her the following day.

Scripted “press conference”. Scripted “interview”.

Abante lists down some of the questions na na-censor during arroyo’s “press conference”.

Ilan sa mga ‘na-censor’ na tanong, kabilang ang tanong ng Abante, ay ang mga sumusunod:

1. Sino ang Comelec official na inamin n’yo na kausap n’yo noong nakaraang eleksyon?

2. Ang pagtatayo ng Truth Commission ay ‘front’ lang daw upang takpan ang tunay na isyu ng pandaraya noong nakaraang eleksyon?

3. How damaging is the current political crisis to your administration? What lessons have you learned?

4. Sinasabotahe daw ng palace ang impeachment proceedings?

5. Malacañang behind move to oust Drilon as Senate President, bina-back-up daw si (Sen.) Miriam (Defensor-Santiago) bilang kapalit?

6. Hyatt 10 magte-testify laban sa inyo sa impeachment?

7. Are you in favor na referendum muna bago ChaCha?

8. Comment on negative surveys?

9. Birthday wish for Susan (Roces)? Is the door of reconciliation still open for her?

10. Would you still accept former allies from Hyatt 10?

11. How’s FG, Mikey? Comment on Sandra Cam’s implication involving you (GMA) on jueteng?

12. How confident are you that you will last your term given the current political situation?

Avatar

soledad t. tubay

July 29th, 2005 at 2:00 pm

Assessing the lines of reasoning from both sides shows the disparity in the kinds of wisdom manifested by the personalities involved. From an objective point of view, more representatives from those calling for the resignation of Mrs. Arroyo demonstrate depth and widom in their views. Their arguments are clear and logical. No specious reasoning. On the other hand, most of the apologists obviously evade critical issues in defense of the president. I hope that people who know in their heart the immediate cause of this call for resignation refrain from quoting from the Holy Book. Instead, examine your consicience and you may be guided by the following Christian values emphasized in the same:
1. Worship only one God. (God is not power or wealth)
2. Respect all people. (no exception)
3. Be humble.
4. Be honest.
5. Live a moral life.
6. Be generous with time and money. (money that is rightfully yours)
7. Practice what you preach; don’t be a hypocrite. (Christ hates hypocrites most of all, and hypocrisy shows on ones countenance; no amount of cosmetics, even surgery, can hide it)
8. Don’t be self-righteous. (that you are the only one adhering to the rule of law)
9. Don’t hold a grudge.
10. Forgive others. (as we forgive you)

Avatar

johnmarzan

July 29th, 2005 at 2:04 pm

what GMA did yesterday with Mike “ilong” Enriquez is not really “damage control”, kasi they were planning the “interview” after the “press conference” all along.

Everything’s scripted now for Arroyo, these days. 😉

Avatar

noelet

July 29th, 2005 at 6:23 pm

Benign0 said,

“And how do you propose to do that? We’ve already seen here how Pinoys are not really one to critically evaluate information. All they do is pretty much stampede towards whoever makes the loudest noise.”

By logic we can say that (exempting FOCAP) Journalist/reporters are all Pinoys. But we cannot say that all Pinoys are journalist. To conclude that Pinoys would stampede whoever speak the loudest is biased.

Strengthening our institutions – do you really know what it means? Media is an institution. Let them do what is their job. Think again? Media are suppose to cover news and not headline every specific words told. Does Benign0 really knows when he say PCIJ starting to get crappy by blow-by-blow report? Or you have the wrong questions… or wrong understanding.

Benign0 said,

“I think those who seem to now fret about the apparent success of GMA’s media blitz are simply getting a taste of their own medicine. Anti-GMA elements engaged in the same tactic as well (which fizzled out when it came to getting people on the streets).”

Do not fool ourselve with such righteousness as spectator-idealism. It’s always the idea of those who know many theoretical things or some kind of real-time parallelism but in reality miserably failed in knowing even a little with the actual situation.

Avatar

noelet

July 29th, 2005 at 6:58 pm

Verna said,

“But instead of this debate, we are now hearing people questioning the move for Charter changes, saying the problem is not the form of government, rather the need for moral change. Clearly, a lot of people are totally ignorant of what’s going on around them! …does he know that the multi-party system has only promoted “personality politics”? Just look at how many political parties have come and gone. What we ought to do is shift to a two-party system… give strength to a political party, not to political animals or political nincompoops!”

Two party system is not federalism nor parliamentarism per se. If you want a 2-party it can be so within our Presidential system – a two party presidential system. But if you want federalism then it becomes a different matter.

How could a two party system prevent “personality politics”? Im very much intrigued. There are so many levels of disgrunt within this current party system. Would you care that we have a fix multi-party, like a permanent 3-party or 4-party. Its the same with a fix 2-party.These will stop parties coming and going. Surely a 2-party system could elect a mojority president than a multi-party. But how bout the case of Independent candidate? You could have a 2-party presidential election with 20 independent presidential candidates, just to exagerrate.

So lets start the debate? No. Lets finish impeachment first.

If you think cha-cha is such a mjor leap forward then let us do it with such clear mind and conscience. Firts thing first – impeachment.

Verna said,

“But the reality is the presidency isn’t just the problem here. We’ve also got 24 other headaches… called Senators, who are mini-dictators in their own right, 24 people out of 85 million Filipinos who control billions of pesos in pork barrel! No, my dear Archbishop Cruz, the present system is very much at fault and if you compare our system of governance to the countries that are better than us, believe me it’s a no brainer!”

Is the problem the billions of pork barrel? Then remove pork barrel not cha-cha.

How can this country survive with a unicameral system? How can they be not a mini-dictators still? Who would pride and champion national cause with nationally elected officials?

Avatar

nnk

July 30th, 2005 at 12:46 am

Thank God theres still PCIJ, the only news source I can trust (aside from PDinquirer). As for Philstar, I don’t read it anymore..Been a Star subscriber for 5 years..but it is obviously biased towards Arroyo. Used to read Max Soliven’s column with GUSTO but am turned off by his biased Pro Arroyo stance (plus hate that HIGOP Alex Magno’s column).

Kahit ano pang chat chat at gimik ni Gloria, she will never win me over. Kaya tayong lahat, wag magpadala sa mapaglinlang na False Prophet na yan.

Kudos to PCIJ for bringning us the truth, hope other media outfits will follow suit.

Avatar

angeltracks

August 1st, 2005 at 11:16 pm

her interview with korinna was also aired tonight on ANC, but she wasn’t answering the really important questions, saying her legal counsel told her to shut up because as it is, her rights have already been so, so violated. maybe i don’t know anything about all that legal stuff, but if i were wrongly accused, i don’t think i’d keep my mouth shut the way she does. i’d also be the first to summon garci and demand that he come out in the open to clarify matters so that my name can be cleared. but no, she doesn’t know where he is ‘daw.’ more importantly, i am stupefied by her seeming lack of concern for having him surface. i don’t know – i just don’t see it as the natural reaction of an innocent person…oh, well…at the same time, she mouths the Lord’s name so often…i think she’s guilty but has said sorry to God and is asking Him for a second chance and maybe she believes the Lord would not scorn her prayer. maybe. and maybe she’ll do her best this time so that when she does leave the palace in 2010, it would not be in disgrace and she’d be leaving behind a long list of accomplishments starting from now. but that still leaves a bad taste in the mouth. i pity her – but she brought this upon herself. i think conrad de quiros is right – it’s her ambition that is her undoing. and we can forgive her and blah blah blah, but even if i am a Christian, i believe she still has to step down – no second chances in cases like this.

Avatar

angeltracks

August 1st, 2005 at 11:32 pm

to PN Abinales – but tiglao looks really mean, doesn’t he? and one can just guess how he’d flare up in the face of so many anti-gma people in the la salle forum. maybe sec ermita would have been the better person to attend such a forum. and even gabby claudio. joey salceda is a die-hard, but i find him kinda ok, too. it’s tiglao and saludo who tend to flare up and become sarcastic – even mean. oh, well – that’s just the impression i get from seeing them on TV.

Avatar

d_entrep

August 7th, 2005 at 2:52 pm

GMA has the best dmage control team.
the best image maker,she is like a chamelion.isa syang hunyango
nagbabago at sumusunod sa kaanyuhan ng kanyang kapaligira.n

I really salute the president GMA’s damage control team
I think it was also the team that FVR has when he was PRESIDENT
I think former president ERAP should have hired them.
maybe EDSA 2 would not have happen and this sort of KARMA
to the PILIPINO people is not happening either.
WHY PEOPLE SO AGHAST AT ERAP CORRUPTION.
IS FVR MUCH LESS THAT ERAP IS MORE PRONE TO CRITICS.
OR IS THE SEED THAT THEY HAVE PLANTED IN OUR BRAINS IS STILL
SPROUTING THE ANGER THAT BROUGHT EDSA 2.
wala namang magandang na i bunga ang EDSA DOS na yan.

Avatar

Inday_D_Mighty

August 7th, 2005 at 7:41 pm

si tiglao parang mukhang bagong gising lagi. does he evere check his hair before leaving his house? mukhang bugnutin! dilat na dilat ang mga mata na parang kuwago.

Avatar

joe

August 7th, 2005 at 9:31 pm

Si Tiglao po ay di bagong gising, sya po ay di na natutulog, lintek na PGMA yan! nagmukha tuloy kuwago si TIGLAO sa laki ng problema on how to make PGMA look good sa tao, LA NA TULUGAN at kahit gustuhin pa nya di na sya makatulog dahil sa bigat ng budhi dahil kailangan nyang magsinungaling para masalba si PanginoongGloriaMacapagalArroyo!!!

Comment Form