September 6, 2005 · Posted in: Arroyo Impeachment, In the News

12:45 pm: 122-42-4

CAGAYAN de Oro Rep. Constantino Jaraula: The two sides have brilliantly articulated their causes. I cannot possibly add anything more. We must think of larger concerns, the survival of our economy. His vote: Yes

Antique Rep. Exequiel Javier: No impeachment complaint may be enforced in a year. "If we cut all the laws against the devil, what law will protect us?" I give the president the benefit of law. When a critical mass could not be mustered, the call for impeachment was then initiated. His vote: Yes

Pasig Rep. Robert Vincent Jaworski: We should not be afraid of what will happen. Just worry for what needs to be done. The Philippines is a democratic state, sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them. The very essence of impeachment is people empowerment. It is a process provided so that the people would not have to resort to other means. We have been robbed of our right, but not our freedom. His vote: No

Cebu Rep. Simeon Kintanar: The 2nd district of Cebu voted overwhelmingly for the President. We were saddened by accusations of cheating in Cebu. It is very important to us to support and respect the President. I have to be guided by the sentiments of the people I represent. His vote: Yes

Cebu City Rep. Raul del Mar: The voice recordings are clearly violative of the wiretapping law and cannot be accepted as evidence. The accusation is that the committee deliberately chose the Lozano complaint because it was a weak complaint, the implication being that it was predetermined exercise to protect the president. This is absolutely wrong. The justice committee had no choice but to uphold the rule of law. His vote: Yes

Negros Occidental Rep. Jose Carlos Lacson: Our country is in political and economic crisis resulting from the Garci tapes controversy. But instead of resorting to the rule of law, some sectors resorted to other means. A vote of 1/3 of the House shall be necessary. In the case at hand, they have to muster that. This is the basic democratic rule and not for people to resort to the rule of mob. We must uphold the Constitution under the process of democracy. His vote: Yes

Misamis Oriental Rep. Danilo Lagbas: No explanation for his Yes vote.

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman: When I supported the debt cap, it was praised. When I advocated for the passage of a magna carta for students, it was applauded. Whe I authored a bill on reproductive health rights and responsible parenthood, women’s groups applauded. I do not need applause for this vote to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law. No impeachment complaint can be filed against the same official in one year. An affirmative vote will strengthen that no illegally obtained evidence will preclude the guilt of any official. An affirmative vote will even accelerate the end to the crisis and stop the political bickerings. His vote: Yes

Tarlac Rep. Jesli Lapus: Calling their impeachment vote as conscience vote, we can grant them that self-adulation. But in theology there could be an erroneous conscience. My vote is a consequence vote. It is a consequence of the complacency of opportunists who seek power by unwittingly aggravating the crisis in our country. We should not jump from the frying pan to the fire. I am instructed by my constituents to maintain our support for the president. His vote: Yes

Eastern Samar Rep. Marcelino Libanan: Let us veer away from the politics of destruction to the politics of performance. We shall refocus the national energy toward solving the concerns of our country, a more fundamental need, the need for charter change. His vote: Yes

Makati Rep. Teodoro Locsin Jr.: The report is quite good. But it fails to address whether or not it was the duty of the committee to consolidate the complaints to one complaint. It also fails to consider whether it was possible to include the fraud in the elections in the complaint. The committee failed to present us with the best of the complaints. It makes it impossible to present a rational choice. His vote: No

Manila Rep. Jaime Lopez: The Lozano complaint was immediately dismissed as insufficient in substance. I cannot join the majority in this issue. There are three classes of fact: buong katotohanan, judicial facts, recital of facts yet to be proven in court. It is my opinion that there was already a recital of facts in the committee that has yet to be examined. The complaint must be recommitted to the committee. His vote: Abstain

Davao Rep. Ruy Elias Lopez: The report dismisses the three reports. Are we afraid of the truth? We should not fear the truth. The truth has yet to be unraveled. It has yet to be heard. The committee report does not seek to reveal this truth. His vote: No

Lanao del Sur Rep. Benasing Macarambon Jr.: I am not a lawyer. But I have observed that only upon the permission of court, wiretapped conversations can only be used for specific laws. I have also read the SC decision and the Francisco et. al and the Davide impeachment. It specifically bars the House from more than one complaint. I am using my conscience now, not for myself but for the Filipino people. It dictates me to look into the effect of the impeachment in the economy. His vote: Yes

APEC Rep. Sunny Rose Madamba: Where is the truth, what is the truth? The interpretation of the Constitution has been presented in the House rules. We examine our conscience and cast our votes. I’m considering our national interest. Her vote: Yes

AVE Rep. Eulogio Magsaysay: This nation is governed by a government of laws. Many were not happy with my decision. But I accept their criticisms, if a Yes vote will bring about a stronger economy, food for our people, education, and peace for our families. I am beholden only to my duty to the people and not anything else. His vote: Yes

Zambales Rep. Ma. Milagros Magsaysay: The impeachment complaint has sparked debates, divisiveness and sleepless nights to us and the country. Everyday people come to me to seek for jobs in the Freeport Zone. Many investors in the zone told me they are afraid of what will happen with their investments. Many of them have stopped their expansion programs until this crisis tides over. Some of my constituents said I should sign the impeachment complaint, but when I went around my district, the majority of them just want jobs. They don’t know any laws if they are hungry. Her vote: Yes

Partido Manggagawa Rep. Renato Magtubo: I am tempted to vote Yes. Not to hide the truth behind the president but to expose a greater truth—the kind of politics we have in Congess. The impeachment of GMA will not solve the crisis. Here, the search for truth and justice has always been and will always be a futile exercise.
What is wrong becomes right, and the truth is hidden. I will take the truth to the parliament of the streets. His vote: No

Davao Oriental Rep. Corazon Malanyaon: My conscience dictates that at all times I can only bring to this body the voice of my constitutents. I cannot negate the authority vested upon me. My vote for the approval is a vote against the impeachment of the president, a vote consistent with the desire of my constituents. Her vote: Yes

Cagayan Rep. Manuel Mamba: When I withdrew my support for the president and endorsed the impeachment, I was motivated by my love of country and our people. I have been a consistent supporter and vote-getter for the president. During the last election, when she lost miserably in region 2, she won overwhelmingly in my town, without having to talk to any election official. But I have always believed that leaders make nations. It is leaders that inspire. Leaders should be beyond reproach, beyond doubt, icons of integrity, decency, and morality. We are tasked to search for the truth. Let us continue. His vote: No

Batangas Rep. Hermilando Mandanas: The significance of this constitutional exercise cannot be overemphasized. The members of the House should continue to fight for the singular opportunity to earnestly search for truth and justice. But no one here has the monopoly of truth. And no one here has a pure conscience to judge the motives of our colleagues. But we have not yet honestly reached out for the truth. Our hearts are still crying out for a true due process. Our people are thirsty for the truth. Our people are tired, they are losing hope. We have to show them that we are doing our best to provide our children a better future. His vote: No

Sultan Kudarat Rep. Suharto Mangudadatu: I believe in the mandate of our president. I rise to speak for our children and our children’s children. A decision has been made. Let us now devote our time to uniting our people. Let us set our country free and to the road to prosperity. His vote: Yes

Alagad Rep. Rodante Marcoleta: I am voting no because we filed the original complaint. We have been getting a lot of flak from the minority and I have repeatedly asked for the opportunity to explain. They tried up to the last minute to make me sign the amended complaint. But I could not. They admitted to me that they needed to add charges to the complaint so they can entice more endorsers. There were concessions in that amended complaint so more will sign. This is sad. And they say they’re for the truth? I am voting no so that people will learn to trust their government a little more, so that we will unite behind our government and heal the wounds brought by this process. His vote: No

Anakpawis Rep. Rafael Mariano: If Malacañang thought that by ending this impeachment process then we have ended the political crisis, they are wrong. This crisis is brought about by the president’s loss of moral ascendancy and the loss of the people’s trust in her. The more that the president covers up the truth, the greater will be the clamor for her to step down. The people are ready to continue the fight. We will bring power to the people. His vote: No

Cebu Rep. Clavel Martinez: I disagree that it is the Lozano complaint that should be accepted. I do not find any support to such contention from any book or from any legal luminaries. Have we fooled ourselves or have we fooled the people? We owe it to the people to be truthful. Her vote: No

Gabriela Rep. Liza Maza: I cannot support a report that seeks to exonerate a President who continues to cheat and lie to the people. The truth will not rest in silence. There are issues such as diverting funds from the Ginintuang Masaganang Ani to support her candidacy. It is saddening that even before and after the elections, the President has been staging her victory; the cheating was done even here in the House of Representatives. How could it have been done without a member of this House allowing it? If the media can find the truth, why can’t we find the truth? Her vote: No

Southern Leyte Rep. Roger Mercado: Be not afraid. God is good. In Southern Leyte, the people want action. They delivered more than 82 percent of votes to the President. No other president except the winner and no other winner except President Arroyo. His vote: Yes

Isabela Rep. Anthony Miranda: "The Filipino is worth dying for." No amount of money can equal what our heroes have achieved for our freedom. I have been accused that I was bribed and that my district received P65 million. This is but commensurate to our need, in building a road. His vote: Yes

Palawan Rep. Abraham Kahlil Mitra: What is popular is not necessarily right. The underlying issue is on the substance and not the form. The offense may or not be an indictable offense. Much has been said and written, we may be wrong or we may be right but there are rules governing the proceedings. If I am to commit a mistake, let it reside in the Constitution. His vote: Yes

Manila Rep. Ernesto Nieva: Why is the president always being blamed for the woes of this nation? His vote: Yes

An Waray Rep. Florencio Noel: Whom should we believe? Who will right the wrong? Who will stand as an example to the next generation? No matter how much we try to right the wrong, may lamat na. We need a credible leader. It is imperative that credible answers are given. The questionable moves of the committee bar the right of the people here. His vote: No

Davao City Rep. Prospero Nograles: I will submit my explanation in writing. His vote: Yes

Bayan Muna Rep. Satur Ocampo: We condemn the junking of the impeachment complaint. The amended complaint is the only qualified and verified complaint. The maneuverings have led to the thwarting of the impeachment of the President. We feel aggrieved. We have been denied justice. Can we say that we’re still doing our duty to the people? It is not here in the halls of the Congress but on the streets that the truth will be known. His vote: No

Davao del Norte Rep. Arrel Olaño: The justice committee made a correct decision. His vote: Yes

La Union Rep. Manuel Ortega: The voice of the people is the voice of the land. By virtue of the overwhelming mandate of my district to represent them, I say, La Union is overwhelmingly voting yes.

22 Responses to 12:45 pm: 122-42-4

Avatar

romblonian

September 6th, 2005 at 12:54 pm

para sa aming kagalanggalang na congressman firmalo ng romblon,

wala pala kayong pinagkaiba kay budoy, TRAPO….

Avatar

PopsJ

September 6th, 2005 at 1:56 pm

Kahit ano pa ang ipagdakdak natin dito sa blog, ang katotohanan ang mahalaga. Ang pangnanakaw, pagsisinungaling at pandaraya na ginawa ng pekeng pangulo. Tutoo talaga.

Biningyan natin ng pagkakataon sa kongreso, subalit dinaan sa numero. Tayo naman ang magpakita at magpadama ng ating kalooban. Ang sigaw — “OUST GMA”.

Hindi man ako makarating sa St. Peter’s Church, bukas, sa EDSA na tayo magkita-kita.

Avatar

MitaMS

September 6th, 2005 at 2:04 pm

Palitan ng isa pang magiging tuta ng kanyang mga kinauutangan….

Avatar

masha

September 6th, 2005 at 2:21 pm

o di lahat ng politico may kinauutangan? so ok na si gma? ganun? kahit yung asawa rin niya ay kahit 1M na komisyon ay di pinapatawad? kahit yung anak niya naging biglang milyonaryo pagkatapos maging bise gobernador at congressman? kahit yung bayaw niya na isang dekada ang nakalipas ay 17K lang ang income tax e ngayon ay 300M ang net worth?

o di ba recycled nga yung mga politico. they’ve had their chance. ganun pa rin. boboto sa impeachment dahil may nag walk out? height na yan ng kabobohan o kahalangan ng bituka.

lakad na sa edsa!

Avatar

opti

September 7th, 2005 at 2:29 am

(1) MY NUMBER IS 0919-5645670. WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE TEXT ME WHERE I CAN SIGN THE PROTEST INITIATED BT THE BUKLURAN PARA SA KATOTOHANAN LED BY CORY AND SUSAN?

JUST TO EXPRESS HOW INDIGNANT I AM AND ABOUT TO EXPLODE, I WOULD LIKE TO DECLARE THAT I AM WILLING TO SIGN THE PROTEST SHEET 1,000,000 TIMES!

(2) FOR BUKLURAN COORDINATORS, IT’S TIME TO FASTTRACK THE GATHERING OF AS MANY CELFONE NUMBERS AS POSSIBLE, ANTI-GMA OR PRO-GMA (DOESN’T MATTER REALLY AS LONG AS THEY ARE WILLING TO SUPPORT THE 2005 PARLIAMENT OF THE STREETS). FOR BETTER SYNCHRONIZATION KASI IN THE RECENT RALLIES, SINTUNADO ANG TIMING AT WALANG SYNERGY. KANYA-KANYA.

(3) I HAVE LONG ADMIRED THE INTELLIGENCE AND SPORTING ATTITUDE OF THE DAUGHTER OF DISGRACED LEADER FERDINAND MARCOS, THE HONORABLE IMEE MERCOS. BUT ON THE DAY OF VOTING ON THE COMMITTEE REPORT 1012, I GAVE UP THAT RESPECT FOR HER BECAUSE SHE ACTED LIKE A BRAT WHO WOULDN’T GIVE HOOT ABOUT PROFESSIONALISM. SHE DISAPPEARED FROM THE SCENE WITHOUT ANYONE KNOWING WHAT HAPPENED! AND TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY, SHE BUNGLED HER JOB TO CONVINCE THE OTHER OPPOSITION CONGRESSMEN SHE WAS ASSIGNED TO NEGOTIATE WITH.
YOU’RE A GONER TO MANY ILOKANOS WHO WITNESSED YOUR INDIFFERENCE, MADAME CONGRESSWOMAN. MANY OF US WERE WATCHING THE PROCEEDINGS AND HEARING THE REPORT ABOUT YOUR AND OTHER CONGRESSMEN’S ABSENCE DURING THE VOTING.

YOU OWE YOUR FELLOW ILOKANOS AND YOUR ILOKANO CONSTITUENTS AN EXPLANATION, PERHAPS EVEN AN APOLOGY.
opti

Avatar

opti

September 7th, 2005 at 2:47 am

I WAS THINKING THAT THE CBCP REPORT ON JULY 10 WAS SOMETHING THAT COULD STAND UP TO THE CALL OF THE TIMES BUT I WAS DISAPPOINTED TO HEAR BISHOP CAPALLA STATING THAT THE REPORT WILL NOT BE CHANGED. AS HE SAID EMPHATICALLY AND QUITE APATHETICALLY “NOT IN MY LIFETIME”.

WITH DUE RESPECT TO THE BISHOP, HOW CAN A PRELATE SAY THAT IN HIS LIFETIME, HE CANNOT INFLUENCE THE STAND OF HIS ORGANIZATION IF HE AS A MORTAL BEING, JUST LIKE THE REST OF US, DOES NOT REALLY KNOW THE FUTURE EVENTS, UNLESS HE CLAIMS TO BE GOD? IS HE SAYING THAT EVEN IF GMA ADMITS FINALLY TO HER WRONGDOING INSTEAD OF JUST SAYING COMMITTING A LAPSE IN JUDGEMENT, THE STAND WILL REMAIN THE SAME? WHERE IS MORALITY THERE? WHERE IS THE CHURCH’S TEACHING ROLE THERE? WHERE IS THE CHURCH’S GOVERNING ROLE THERE? WHERE IS THE CHURCH’S SANCTIFYING ROLE THERE?

TSK, TSK,TSK. SPEAKING OF NON-PARTISANSHIP!

opti

Avatar

soledad t. tubay

September 7th, 2005 at 12:50 pm

A thoughtful reading of the reasons for the votes of NO reveal the quality of oppostion leaders there are in Congress. Sound logic is vry evident and contrary to what the majority peddles, these pro impeachment congressmen use reason not emotion. Always the strategy of the guilty is quite obvious. But time will be the better judge as this issue gets ripe for the picking.

Sabi nga sa isang lokal na pelikula may himala at ang himalang ito ay nasa puso ng bawat isa NA NANINIWALA SA KATOTOHANAN.

Avatar

soledad t. tubay

September 7th, 2005 at 12:51 pm

Mabuhay ka Congressman Locsin. When I met your daughter in one PR convention I thought she must have come from a great family because she is the daughter of TEDDY BOY, yet she doesn’t have airs and was so simple and unassuming.

Avatar

masha

September 7th, 2005 at 12:55 pm

kasi si capalla nabili na ni gma thru genuino with pagcor funds. marami yang baho na itinatago kaya kaya-kayang i-cow ni gma yan.

Avatar

kavenishi

September 7th, 2005 at 1:01 pm

soledad t. tubay said,
September 7, 2005 @ 12:50 pm

A thoughtful reading of the reasons for the votes of NO reveal the quality of oppostion leaders there are in Congress. Sound logic is vry evident and contrary to what the majority peddles, these pro impeachment congressmen use reason not emotion. Always the strategy of the guilty is quite obvious. But time will be the better judge as this issue gets ripe for the picking.

Sabi nga sa isang lokal na pelikula may himala at ang himalang ito ay nasa puso ng bawat isa NA NANINIWALA SA KATOTOHANAN.

**********************************************************************

why the pro impeachment congressman use the word “TRUTH” always on their cause. Do they have the monopoly of the truth. Is it what they seeking is for the ouster of PGMA and not the whole truth. Because if they will say they are seeking for the whole truth, then they should also say that they are seeking for the presidency not only for the truth…Nobody can own the truth, but they are claiming it. I don’t like PGMA but mas ayaw ko sa taong nagmamalinis. As if the pro impeachment congressman are saints and holy in the way they are talking.

Avatar

masha

September 7th, 2005 at 1:03 pm

nobody who wants to maintain intellectual honesty would find the reasons to kill the impeachment complaint sufficient. most of the reps who killed the complaint are beholden to gma in one way or another, their reasons are not made on the basis of substance. karamihan rin sa kanila are intellectually featherweight, like foot in mouth disease stricken miguel zubiri. kabobong tao na nagpapanggap na may alam. isa pa yung anak ni ermita na asawa ni eric buhain. she wouldnt be in congress and her husband wouldn occupy a prominent position in the sporting world if not for gma. eric buhain may have been a competent swimmer but he is a dufus in management and he comes POC chair? that’s why our sports system is so f****d up. puro mga lintik na appointees na pinag iinteresan lang ang pera from different federations.

Avatar

masha

September 7th, 2005 at 1:10 pm

may nagmamalinis ba. youre over interpreting things. may nagsabi ba na lily-pure sila? na nagmamalaki na santo sila? yan ang mahirap sa di tuwid ang pag rarason; hinahalo-halo ang mga issues. na dapat dumaan si gma sa impeachment trial ay ibang issue sa mga naglalaway sa posisyon ng pagka president na ibang isyu rin kung sila nga ay santo. at the very least gma should answer the issues squarely and substantively. ngayon kaya nga may provision sa constitution sa succession ng pagka presidente, kung maayos ang impeachment at siya ay napatunayang nagkasala, si noli ang dapat pumalit accdg to the constitution. tapos ang mga naglalaway. ngayon kung meron mang nag i-illusiong santo sila at may katunayan ka na tulad ng garci tapes at er’s e di kasuhan mo sila.

wag mong pag halu-haluin ang mga issues nakakagulo ka lang.

Avatar

kavenishi

September 7th, 2005 at 1:34 pm

Yes i have. When the pro impeachment said that whoever did not sign the impeachment complain is not for the truth. And whoever sign for the impeachment complain is for the truth. Is that the right word? They should say whoever will not sign to the impeachment complain will be for GMA to stay in office and whoever sign the impeachment complain will be in favor for the ouster of PGMA. Because we already know the truth that PGMA is the one in the Garci tape (she admitted it already). We already believe she really cheated on the election. And i believe also FPJ really did win the election and not PGMA. But to much exaggerated statement of the pro impeachment congressman is the one i don’t like. Make it direct to the point. Ther person who sign is for the ouster of PGMA and those who did not sign is for PGMA to stay. And not the word truth is the basis because we already know the truth, and all the lies the administration is doing.
Now about Noli? Will this people against PGMA accept Noli as president? I don’t think so. Will Lacson, Erap mens, Loren will accept him as presiden? of course not.. then we have another impeachment against noli…

Avatar

enlightened_pinay

September 7th, 2005 at 1:54 pm

kavenishi said,
September 7, 2005 @ 1:34 pm

Ther person who sign is for the ouster of PGMA and those who did not sign is for PGMA to stay. And not the word truth is the basis because we already know the truth, and all the lies the administration is doing.
=========

Yes for these congressment & for these politicians. But not for ordinary citizens like me who has nothing to gain really EXCEPT TO HEAR THE TRUTH SUPPOSEDLY THROUGH AN HONEST IMPEACHMENT, and that is whether or not Arroyo stays in office.

Avatar

kavenishi

September 7th, 2005 at 2:09 pm

Yes for these congressment & for these politicians. But not for ordinary citizens like me who has nothing to gain really EXCEPT TO HEAR THE TRUTH SUPPOSEDLY THROUGH AN HONEST IMPEACHMENT, and that is whether or not Arroyo stays in office.

*********************************************************************

Hey thanks for the comments. But are you expecting an honest impeachment here. Lets face reality, impeachment is a political exercise. So were talking here about numbers, about political affiliations about majority rules. Were not talking here about which is good or bad. Which is true or not and were not talking here about who is right or wrong. So the reality is, honest impeachment will never exist. And I will accept this tradition, i will not but i’m only 1 person, maybe we are already 2 or 3 who want honest impeachment, unfortunately we are not the congressman who are playing the games.

Avatar

enlightened_pinay

September 7th, 2005 at 2:13 pm

Ok good for you kaveneshi. But that is NOT ACCEPTABLE to me & atleast to majority of the bloggers here.

Avatar

koj

September 7th, 2005 at 2:17 pm

enlightened_pinay said,
September 7, 2005 @ 1:54 pm

Yes for these congressment & for these politicians. But not for ordinary citizens like me who has nothing to gain really EXCEPT TO HEAR THE TRUTH SUPPOSEDLY THROUGH AN HONEST IMPEACHMENT, and that is whether or not Arroyo stays in office.

=========
to hear the truth nga lng ba…coz you don’t need an impeachment to know it. the truth is out there, and gma cheated in the last election, and so is everyone else, i suspect.

impeachment is a political exercise and whether we like it or not, it will be used by politicians for their interest. we cannot expect much of it if we don’t have the numbers. the reason why the opps never thought of it as the first option.

the streets is a better alternative…unfortunately (and irony) people refused to heed the call to march…what could be the reason?

Avatar

kavenishi

September 7th, 2005 at 2:28 pm

to hear the truth nga lng ba…coz you don’t need an impeachment to know it. the truth is out there, and gma cheated in the last election, and so is everyone else, i suspect.

impeachment is a political exercise and whether we like it or not, it will be used by politicians for their interest. we cannot expect much of it if we don’t have the numbers. the reason why the opps never thought of it as the first option.

the streets is a better alternative…unfortunately (and irony) people refused to heed the call to march…what could be the reason?

********************************************************************

You’ve got it koj… Yes if were seeking for truth is not only the impeachment process. The truth is already obvious if we will use our common sense. That’s why i’m also wondering what truth they are looking. We all agree here that PGMA really cheated in the last election ( no doubt about it!). And the truth it impeachment in congress means number. Whoever have the number, majority rules….
And the reason why people refused to heed the call to march in the street maybe they don’t trust the leader and people of the so called Civil society. People don’t want to remove somebody who is stubbing there back and replace her with somebody who will hit there head. They are still studying the situation afterwards and weighing the options they may still have. What comes next if we remove PGMA? We need to know the domino effect of our action today.

Avatar

enlightened_pinay

September 7th, 2005 at 2:35 pm

To HEAR THE TRUTH for me is to comprehend the evidences, identify all the accomplocices and collaborators. JUSTICE should come afterwards.

Avatar

kavenishi

September 7th, 2005 at 2:46 pm

enlightened_pinay said,
September 7, 2005 @ 2:35 pm

To HEAR THE TRUTH for me is to comprehend the evidences, identify all the accomplocices and collaborators. JUSTICE should come afterwards.

*******************************************************************
Yes i absolutely agree with you, but if we see that the pro administration is blocking everything that the anti-gma forces is doing to present their evidence they have then the option is just use our common sense to know the truth…
Justice should come afterwards, YES! And also lets not avoid that we should also put someone for the presidency? Who is he/she? If you have names, may i know them if these names are acceptable to other bloggers here…

Avatar

Lulu

September 7th, 2005 at 6:26 pm

Isang malaking pagkakamali ang ginawang pagbabasura sa impeachment. Hindi ko alam kung bakit ganito ang nangyari. Nagbubulagbulagan at halata ang mga congressman na nagbasura sa impeachment. Talagang gusto nila ng gulo! De Venecia ikaw ba namumuno? Nagtatanong lang po dahil obvious po. Di po bulag ang mga tao winawalang bahala nyo ang pulso ng mga tao. Wag naman. Kahit anong gawin ninyo di na ninyo mapapaupo si FVR. Pag oposisyon na ang nakaupo diyan sa palasyo siguradong maraming lilitaw na anomalya kakurakutan ginawa yang si FVR. Pakiramdam lang po ito ng isang mamayan simple pero mar concern sa bayan. Kaya kahit anong mangyari di nila papayagang ipamahala sa oposisyon lalabas at lalabas ang baho paG ITOY NANGYARI. Kaya nga pinilit na tanggalin si ERAP eh: opinyon lang po.

Saludo po ako sa mga oposition congressmen ang tatapang ninyo! May mga balls ( yung iba dyan mga walang balls). Di ko maintindihan yung mga bumoto ng abstain bakit? Sana di na kayo kasama wala ring kayong balls. Kung baga sa giyera nagtago sila. Ay naku sana di nakayo iboto ulit.

Avatar

Bernard Molmisa

September 7th, 2005 at 8:15 pm

Ang palaging dinadahilan ng hindi sumuporta sa impeachment ay “BATAS” o “RULE OF LAW”.
Ang alam ko, ang BATAS ay ginawa para magkaroon ng KATARUNGAN para sa bawat isa. Ang tanong…KUNG SAKALING TUNAY NGA NA NAGKASALA ANG PANGULO,”MAKATARUNGAN BA NA MANATILI SA PWESTO ANG NANDAYA SA ELEKSYON”? Ang tanong pa…PAANO NA NGAYON MAPAPATUNAYAN NA NANDAYA O HINDI ANG PANGULO, NGAYONG PINATAY NA ANG IMPEACHMENT?
“PROLONGING THE AGONY? HINTAY NA LANG TAYO ULIT NG ISANG TAON?”
Nakakalungkot…sinasabi natin na lahat tayo ay gustong umusad na ang bansa pero hindi ito nagsisimula sa pamunuan. Palagay ko’y “HINDI UUSAD ANG BANSA HANGGAT PINAGDUDUDAHAN ANG PANGULO”.
Tapos na sana lahat ng ito kung Sumumpa si Pangulong Arroyo sa ngalan ng Diyos sa harapan ng mamamayan at sabihin niyang “WALA SIYANG KASALANAN”. Magagawa niya ito kung tunay na malinis ang kanyang konsiyensiya..Diyos na ang idadamay niya..at alam kong may takot pa siya dito.Sa kabaligtaran,hindi niya magawa ito marahil dahil mayroong siyang dapat ikatakot sa Diyos sa maaring maling nagawa niya.
Lahat tayo ay gustong matapos na ito, kailangan lang ng mga bayaning magsusuko at magaalay ng personal na interes, PRIDE, o maging buhay para sa kapakanan ng Dakilang Bayang Pilipinas…

Comment Form