THE government has arrested two congressmen and announced that at least four others may soon find themselves behind bars in the wake of a failed attempt to oust President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. The clampdown does not only call to mind the mood right after the declaration of martial law when Ferdinand Marcos ordered his political enemies imprisoned. The similarity reaches farther back in time to an incident that is hardly mentioned in Philippine history. Sixty years ago, government ordered the expulsion of leftists in the legislature.

The year was 1946 and a coalition of leftist and libertarian forces called the Democratic Alliance (DA), along with the Nacionalista Party (NP), fielded candidates for seven districts in Central Luzon, the bastion of the resistance movement against the Japanese occupation.

The DA was composed of the Partiko Komunista ng Pilipinas (PKP), the Hukbo ng Bayan Laban sa Hapon (Hukbalahap), the Pambansang Kilusan ng Magbubukid, and the Civil Liberties Union, among others. The candidates were mostly from the middle class—one was a doctor, three were lawyers, one was a civil servant while the rest were men of equally good standing in the community. All in all, there were six DA and one NP congressmen from Central Luzon who were carried by that alliance.

At that time, the United States was about to grant the Philippines its independence. The DA was campaigning on an anti-parity platform: they rejected the idea of giving Americans equal rights to do business in the country and exploit its natural resources, a right they thought should be held solely by Filipinos. The campaign apparently did not sit well with the Americans or their friends in the House of Representatives.

What follows was pieced together by PCIJ from the transcripts of House sessions from 1946 to 1947 and from the book “Memoirs of a Communist” written by one of the DA congressmen, the late Dr Jesus Lava. The account was published in a chapter of the PCIJ book, The Rulemakers. Below is an abridged version:

Soon after the House of Representatives convened on May 25, 1946, the leaders of the Liberal Party, then the ruling party in the country, questioned the presence of the DA members in the House. LP leader Jose Topacio Nueno filed a resolution against the DA members, citing a Commission on Election report issued just two days before “regarding scandalous terroristic irregularities” that occurred in the April 23, 1946 elections. On further questioning, Nueno admitted he was the only one who had seen a copy of that report at that point.

Armed only with the mysterious resolution, Nueno said the victories of the Central Luzon congressmen were dubious, and asked that the House defer their oath-taking. As if to show that he was not singling out the DA, Nueno included in the resolution the names of two LP congressmen who were eventually dropped from the list.

For days, the congressmen were in limbo. They collected salaries and held office but were ignored and were not allowed to vote on House measures. It was only House minority leader Cipriano Primicias of the NP who took the cudgels for the DA congressman.

Finally, Primicias haggled with other House leaders to allow the DA congressmen to speak. They did so in Pilipino, perhaps the first time in history that the national language was heard in the halls of Congress that until then reverberated with speeches delivered in either English or Spanish.

Luis Taruc, Huk Supremo and representative from Pampanga, pointed to his landslide victory — that he had gotten 39,000 votes as against his opponent’s 1,000. He also his cited the Huks’ role in the liberation campaign and how they marched with the US forces to help liberate Manila.

Nueno did not let that pass. He proposed that all the Huks surrender their firearms, offering to match with his own every gun the Huks laid down. “I have more than 1,000 guns in my possession,” Nueno said.

Tension mounted in the session hall soon after that. Lava recalled: “In the heat of the verbal tussles, LP congressmen led by Nueno began to show extreme aggressiveness and combativeness, displaying their firearms for all to see,” Lava wrote. Congressional records also note NP congressman Alex Santos challenging Nueno to a fight at a time and a place of Nueno’s choosing.

Lava went on: “With that challenge, Alex brought out his pistol from his portfolio, and placed it squarely on the table. I myself had my hand grasping my gun inside my portfolio, not really knowing what to do, whom to shoot at, if and when firing started.” Cooler heads prevailed and averted a congressional bloodbath.

Eventually, the government intensified its attacks on the Left, while the Left pursued anti-government action. Lava and Taruc were forced to go back to the hills. Historian Manuel Caoili says this incident set off the peasant rebellion in 1946 and is the reason that the peasants, workers and other nationalist groups have been poorly represented in Congress.

The 1987 Constitution changed all that. It had a provision that allowed marginalized sectors to be represented through the party-list system. Crispin Beltran, Rafael Mariano, Satur Ocampo, Liza Masa, Joel Virador were supposed to be symbols of a democracy that made space for long unrepresented marginalized groups.

55 Responses to Haunted by the past

Avatar

scud_1975

February 28th, 2006 at 2:16 pm

Bitin ang kwento..what did these Honorable Congressmen do for the good of our country mula nang malagay sila jan at makatanggap ng pork barrel fund?

Avatar

filoxym

February 28th, 2006 at 2:18 pm

A government by presentation not by representation.

Avatar

jr_lad

February 28th, 2006 at 2:47 pm

what did they do for the country? they are doing it for their marginalized representation. kaya nga party-list group eh.

and for the message of the above post. it’s simple. single out and attack only the leftist group and they will all go back to the mountains. why only them and with age old cases? (as par as i know cory during her time has granted amnesty to all armed and political groups/prisoners during the time of marcos). so what’s happening now? and what about those despised opposition leaders who are equally vocal against the govt.? why are they not arrested and charge with sedition? di nila kaya? what an injustice!

Avatar

scud_1975

February 28th, 2006 at 3:09 pm

Those despised opposition leaders that you are saying are genuine oppositions. I can’t imagine the likes of Pimentel and Biazon na makikipag alyansa sa mga komunista. Mabuti nga mamundok na lang mga leftist group na yan, go back to where they belong..magtanim ng kamote at mangolekta ng revolutionary taxes.

sino nga ba mas may malaking kapalpakan? si Cory na nagbigay ng amnesty sa mga komunista. o si Ramos na nagbigay sa mga rebeldeng sundalo ng parusang 20 push-ups,binalik sa serbisyo at napromote pa. At ngayon sino ang mga araw araw nagpapa”kyut” sa TV..yung mga dating nagmumurahan,ngayon magkakapit-bisig! DYOSKOLORD!!

Avatar

jr_lad

February 28th, 2006 at 3:38 pm

genuine na kung genuine (at hindi lang si biazon or pimentel ang sinasabi ko. isama mo rin sina binay, si erap & family, marcos family, si randy david, etc.) . ang sinasabi ko where is justice here? pare-pareho lang ang isinisigaw ng mga iyan. bakit puro leftist lang ang kinasuhan? anong kaululan yan? sa sinasabi mong mabuti pang mamundok na ang mga leftist na yan ay ipinipakita mo lang kung ano ang totoong nasa loob mo. hindi ka rin parehas. naniniwala ka rin sa mga tsismis na pilit mong tinutuligsa laban sa media sa dahil sa pagiinsulto sa mga taong eto na hindi mo rin kilala.

“yung mga dating nagmumurahan,ngayon magkakapit-bisig!”

dahil kailangang magkaisa lahat ng oposisyon para mapatanggal si glue-ria na kapit tuko sa puwesto. naiintindihan nila na kailangan ang puwersa ng mga estrada at mga marcos para maging isang malakas na boses at puwersa ang oposisyon laban kay glue-ria. may mangyayari ba pag watak-watak ang mga yan?

at hindi pinag-uusapan dito kung sino ang may mas malaking kapalpakan. ang pinag-uusapan dito ay kung sino ang may kasalanan na kailangang managot. or gusto mo ring bigyan na lang ng 20 push-ups si glue-ria?

Avatar

Alecks Pabico

February 28th, 2006 at 6:31 pm

Scud_1975,

I suggest you buy a copy of The Rulemakers: How the Wealthy and Well-Born Dominate Congress. But since I see that you are in Canada, you can probably place an order (for only US$15 including shipping costs) and we’ll mail the book to you. :-)

Avatar

scud_1975

February 28th, 2006 at 9:35 pm

Sure Alecks, i’ll get one. I want to know what happened after the 1987 constitution allowed these sectors to run under party-list system. Thanks :)

Avatar

CGBacani

March 1st, 2006 at 3:50 am

The attack against the Left is but a simple justification by GMA for the media and members of Congress to stop in their search for Truth on Garcia tapes and the many scandals that is rocking the country. We all know that the opposition, even with the aid of the left (and the right) are not in a position to launch a decisive blow for the downfall of GMA. The Proc 1017 is part of GMA’s defensive strategies, similar to her Executive Order banning members of Cabinet to attend congressional hearings.

It is but a way to perpetuate her cheatings and corruption. And she is not done yet. GMA is creating her own road to perdition.

Avatar

ipe

March 1st, 2006 at 10:15 am

Kung minsan problema ang pag-label — kaliwa, kanan, gitna. Kung titingnan, hindi lamang naman ang kaliwa ang nagdadala ng kaguluhan. Ang pagsali ng mga taga-kaliwa sa “mainstream,” halimbawa sa pagtakbo sa halalan para sa legal na posisyon, ay isa nang adjustment sa kanilang hanay matapos ma-realize na ang rebolusyon ay hindi lamang mapagwawagian sa pamamagitan ng baril. Kung titingnan nga, kahit ang mga nasa militar, sa kanilang pagsasalita tungkol sa pangangailangang masugpo ang korupsyon, maipamahagi nang may katarungan ang mga lupang pangsakahan, makapagdala ang gobyerno sa mga mamamayan nito ng mga batayang serbisyo ay inaari na ring kanila ang mga dating slogan lamang daw ng mga kaliwang personalidad..
Kung ang kaliwa ay nakagawa ng adjustment sa kanilang bahagi, na patunay na puwede silang umayon sa tanda ng panahon, bakit ang nasa poder ng gobyerno ay hindi? Bakit kaya hindi makita ng mga taong-gobyerno na hindi lahat ng kaguluhan ay dala ng mga nasa kaliwang hanay? Na madalas, ang mga kaguluhan ay gawa lamang ng presidenteng peke?

Avatar

luzviminda

March 1st, 2006 at 10:27 am

As I see it, these cases that are being charged to these leftists are really old cases being revived by PNP headed by Lomibao. Dahil wala naman talagang ebidensya that they are commiting rebellion against Arroyo. Imagine, rebellion against Marcos pa, continuing offense daw, ngayon pwede pa rin against kay Arroyo. Palpak na naman si Lomibao. Palibhasa damay siya sa pandaraya nuong 2004 election kaya takot na mawala ang amo nya, dahil sabit na siya.

At pinipilit ni Lomibao at corrupt AFP officials na pagdikitin ang Magdalo at Leftist para i-discourage ang mga supporters ng Magdalo, sibilyan man o sundalo. Isa pa sa mga dahilan ay para hindi iwanan ni Uncle Sam (US Govt) ang gobyerno ni Arroyo. Remember that the US is just watching. Ibig sabihin pwede rin silang sumuporta sa papalit kay Arroyo.

Alam ni Lomibao & the corrupt AFP generals that the real threat will be coming from the disgruntled soldiers that is growing everyday. But they do not know exactly how and when it will come.

Avatar

rego

March 1st, 2006 at 12:00 pm

scud_1975 said,
February 28, 2006 @ 3:09 pm

sino nga ba mas may malaking kapalpakan? si Cory na nagbigay ng amnesty sa mga komunista. o si Ramos na nagbigay sa mga rebeldeng sundalo ng parusang 20 push-ups,binalik sa serbisyo at napromote pa. At ngayon sino ang mga araw araw nagpapa”kyut” sa TV..yung mga dating nagmumurahan,ngayon magkakapit-bisig! DYOSKOLORD!!

==========================================

naku scud, obvios ba? pareho silang palpak! kaya lumaki ang mga ulo ng mga yan tarantadong mga coup plotters at mga leftist na yan. Pag nakikita ko ang mag pinangagawa ng mag party list rep na yan. nakakaguilty dahil binoto ko.

actually the essence of allowing the leftists to run in congress is for them to stop going to the streets and participate in nation building. pero tingnan mo ang ginawa ng mag hunghang. walang tigil pa ring nangugulo sa mga kalsada. ganun din ang tanong ko ano nga ba ang nagawa ng mga punyetang to sa congress . an tatagal na ng yan sa congress eh. nasaan nag mga bill that lift the lives of the poor. tama ka mamundok na nga uli sila o kay ikulong.

same goes to the military coup plotters. enough is enough! ikulong na ang mga hinayupak na yan Gloria, please lang….

Avatar

jonathan

March 1st, 2006 at 1:01 pm

Boy oh boy. These are the kinds of people that the commies want – simpletons! Naive to the bone. You guys don’t wanna know what the commies will do to your freedom once they are in power? Or to your religion? Read world history you morons! And you think the Rightist Military can go to bed with the Communist Left once they are in power. Hell no! The power struggle will be a thing to watch. Probably set back the Philippine economy for one more generation. Kaya kayong mga romantics na nagiisip that you got marriage made in heaven, think again. Once this socalled junta will takeover, you’ll swear to high heavens you weren’t born a Filipino.

Avatar

jr_lad

March 1st, 2006 at 1:24 pm

jonathan moron, no need to read world history. just read phil history if the reds has a chance to prevail in the phils. huwag ka ng manakot sa mga specter ng communism dahil alam mo na hindi uubra eto sa mga pilipino. sarilinin mo na lang yang paranoia mo. don’t tell us also about those propagandas about the military going to bed with the reds. ang pinag-uusapan dito ay ang justice ng pagpapatupad ng sinasabing seditious acts laban sa mga anti-arroyo forces. we are not talking of either kaliwa or kanan here. tatanungin kita uli, ano ang pinagkaiba ng isinisigaw ng mga eto kumpara sa mga sinisigaw nila cory, binay, estradas, tatad, maceda, hyatt 10, civl society, randy david, etc. etc. bakit sila lang ang hinuhuli at kinasuhan? kahit na inutile house representatives pa sila (the house is now under the executive branch). kung pinaghuhuli nila lahat yang mga kalaban ni glue-ria wala tayong pagtatalunan dito. doon lang tayo magtatalo sa legality ng paghuli.

Avatar

dimasalang

March 1st, 2006 at 1:42 pm

Correction, there is no such position as Huk Supremo. I have been acquianted to several Huk leaders and they have been telling me that there is no such thing. This title has only been tagged to Luis Taruc by media during those days because he has become the poster-boy of the Hukbalahap movement.

Avatar

jonathan

March 1st, 2006 at 2:07 pm

jr_lad, sa tingin mo nagpapakahirap ang mga pulahan sa pagrarally just to give way to the rightists once they are in power. I think they’ve learned their lessons by now. And you honestly believe that their struggle will stop once Gloria is out of power? Simpleton! The commies are fighting for an ideology and if ever they are mouthing Oust Gloria right now nakikisakay lang sila sa uso. But their ultimate aim my friend is to take over the politics of the country and impose their ideology. And once they are in power they will pulverize opposition to their rule. And that’s why Im asking you to read World History dahil may parallelism. And going back to your diatribe about unfairness sa panghuhuli sa opposition, that’s a military operation which is based on information not available to us right now. Of course I would like to see all destabilizers thrown in jail para madala. Habang bakla-treatment ang ibibigay sa kanila uulit na uulit ang mga iyan.

Avatar

dimasalang

March 1st, 2006 at 3:04 pm

Jonathan,

The world’s experience with communism is colorful. There have been disasters (i.e. Pol Pot, Stalin, etc.) but there are also brilliance (i.e. Fidel Castro, Mao, etc.). So, you cannot generalize the effects of communism based only on historical facts.

You mentioned that you want to see all destabilizers jailed. Can you specifically describe a destabilizer so that we’ll know whom you are referring to.

Avatar

long71

March 1st, 2006 at 8:44 pm

i think what he meant by destabilizers are people who say bad things abt the present administration.:-) say:”dapat paalisin na natin sa puesto si gloria!”—thats inciting to sedition under gloria.

Avatar

jr_lad

March 2nd, 2006 at 12:34 am

jonathan bozo, as what teddy locsin said, “beltran’s arrest was based on an alleged offense made stale by time and hallowed by history as patriotism. it followed that if beltran was charged with rebellion in the last and “waning, waning” year of the marcos dictatorship, to borrow the cryptic words of fvr, wouldn’t that not be to beltran’s credit rather than peril?” between your words and teddy locsin, I’ll readily believe the later… even blindly.

and between us loudmouths here and those so-called “leftist” party list groups that are constantly being badmouthed here, who do you think have made more impact on the lives of ordinary filipinos? maybe ipagyayabang nyo na naman yang mga dollar remittances nyo na pinapadala. but whatabout these people? really, what have they done for our poor countrymen? napakatanga nyo kung ang iniisip nyo lang alam gawin ng mga eto ay magrally ng magrally buong maghapon at magsisigaw laban sa gobyerno. do you know what these people have been doing all there lives aside from marching in the streets? these people have been serving the poorest of the poor through the various NGO’s that they are running. they have the genuine care for the poor that sadly the govt. failed to provide like those poor people in the countryside. the indigenous people, those victims of war, the marginalized groups, women & children and many more. ask any govt. social worker if they have dared go up in the mountains and care for those poor folks leaving there. those muslim areas. those poor remote barangays in the mountains that are found to be suffering from tuberculosis, ask them who dared reach-out to them and care for them. these I have witnessed. i really don’t care and fear about their “leftist” leanings. i admire these people because of the genuine care and sacrifices that they are doing for the poor. and most of the time these people are subject of harassment (sometimes deadly) from the military.

so what’s a leftist? party-list groups? destablisers? pro-poor?

Avatar

jonathan

March 2nd, 2006 at 1:27 am

dimasalang,
sad to say the worlds experience with experience with communism is mostly disastrous. Mao and Fidel poster boys of successful communist governnance? Hardly. China is a good example of what capitalism can do to a previously backward communist regime. Dont tell me you dont know whats happening to Fidel’s Cuba? That country, notwithstanding its success in athletics, is stuck in the 1950’s. I dont even have to tell about Russia and the Eastern European countries which are the laggards in Europe. So don’t buy those bull shits from your PolSci professors about the beauty of communism. World History proved them wrong.

jr_lad the village idiot,
Oh my heart grieves with your vanilla stories. Romanticizing the leftist party groups as some sort of Robin Hoods and other ek-eks. Well and good if thats what they are all about. No argument there, What I am against are those groups that are using their congressional pork to finance the pursuit of their failed ideology. Who collect taxes from poor farmers, bomb utilities installations, harass construction/mining companies, and ambush soldiers. Tell me what civilized societies will tolerate those kinds of activities. They are nothing but hoodlums with misplaced brains. Like what I told you, read world history and learn the lessons of Eastern Europe, China, USSR.

Avatar

naykika

March 2nd, 2006 at 8:48 am

Communism, marxism, nazism, Leninism and catholicism and jewism and all kind of ism were all the fruituitions of great thinkers. Most of them get to their present state by way of persuasions, great wars, lot of miseries, violence, purges and shown the worst and the best of humanity. Some failed after the experiment failures. But the one that I believe going to stay with us and if only we can make it work better is the one coined by someone that sound like this: The Government of the People, by the People and for The People. my piece on this subject.

Avatar

rego

March 2nd, 2006 at 10:57 am

Come to think of it, ilang taon na ba ang sinasabi ng mga leftist sa kanilang pakikibaka “kuno”? Ilang taon na ba silang nag “care” sa mga mahihirap kuno. Ab eh di pa yata ako pinapanganak nandyan na yan sila eh. Anong klaseng pauruga ba sa mahihirap ang kanilang gina gawa at hanggang ngayon mahihirap pa rin ang mga ang kanilang inaaruga?

Sa congress, ilang taon na ba sila? So anu ano ang mga pro poor bill na naipasa nila na makaktulong sa pagaangat ng mga mahihirap?

Avatar

jr_lad

March 2nd, 2006 at 2:15 pm

jonathan, the girl who cried wolf.
now you are equating these party-list groups as those people who are collecting revolutionary taxes from the poor (and then giving it back?), doing terroristic acts, ambush soldiers, plot against the govt., those hoodlums with misplaced brains (i hope yours is not) who are using their congressional pork to finance the pursuit of their failed ideology. wow, that’s a very serious allegation (isafp should hire you). that’s what you get i think in reading world history (perhaps more of mccarthism?) simple lang yan, if you have the evidence arrest them and charge them in court. why the govt. has not arrested these people alongggg time ago? but do you really have the evidence to support your claim? when earlier i was questioning the unjust arrest of these people, you justified that the military must have information not available to us. not available to us! you don’t know? how come you don’t know eh mas sobra pa ata sa isafp yang hawak mo na mga ebidensiya laban sa mga pulahang eto sa mga pinagsasabi mo. mukhang mas magaling ka pa nga kaysa kina corpus at gonzales sampu ng kanilang mga tauhan. matagal na nilang pinaplano kung paano makasuhan ang mga eto.
but don’t’ think i’m condoning those acts that you’re mentioning above. if you or the govt. have proofs to support your claim that these bayan muna, gabriela, anak pawis and other “leftist” organizations have direct participations with those heinous crimes that you’ve mentioned then go ahead arrest them. i’m one with you in condemning these people. no argument also. crucify them. but if what you’re doing here is simply parroting the statements made by the military and norberto gonzales then you better convince simpleton people around here (afterall i noticed there are lots of them here lately). but you have to be fair also with your accusations in calling these people terrorist without concrete proof while you are saying that accusations against your idol are all fabricated by the opposition out to grab power.

may I ask you? in the past and present administrations was there a chance that leftist personalities were appointed to higher and sensitive positions? if ever there was, did they pose any threat to our so called democracy since they have their chance already? or say made a grand plot to take-over power from the govt.?. maybe you will say oh yes, there was. people like joker arroyo, victor corpuz, boy morales and now norberto gonzales. right!

“Everyone is a little subversive but thee and me, and sometimes I think even thee-,” Daniel Fitzpatrick, St Louis
Post-Dispatch (23rd February, 1947)

Avatar

jr_lad

March 2nd, 2006 at 2:24 pm

here’s the link to teddy boy locsin’s privileged speech in congress last feb 27…

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=31405

Avatar

jr_lad

March 2nd, 2006 at 2:26 pm

the title of the speech. “can’t destroy democracy to save it”.

Avatar

jonathan

March 2nd, 2006 at 2:57 pm

jr_mag ladlad ka na,
you’re misreading me junior. I said the works of those NGOs that are truly grassroots organization out to help the least of our brethren must be commended. But there are organizations which are wolves but masked in sheeps clothing that I abhor. If you want to find out go to Tony Abayas publication at http://www.tapatt.org and you will have info about events that are taking place in Philippine society and who the players are. the reason why im calling people who romanticize these commies as simpletons is because they fail to realize that these people are hardened ideologues who will not hesitate to kill to advance their cause. Mcarthyism is engaging in witchunting which Im not. These leftists are openly red and should i say “proud of it”. Do they pose a threat to democracy? Verily, cause while they call themselves democratic, their ideology calls for the destruction of the democratic way of life. Stifling dissent when in power. While you mentioned acknowledged leftists who have been appointed to top government posts as proof that they are “benign” im not talking about individuals here but parties taking over reins of government with communism as a platform, unless you want to discuss the performance of bobbit sanchez who literally scared away foreign investors with his pro-KMU stance.

Avatar

spellvexit

March 3rd, 2006 at 1:12 am

There is a sad element in all these political fighting. The opposition, though noisy, hasn’t been able to get its acts together. The administration, instead of using the resources of the state to further the national interest, has managed to efficiently dispose of national resources only to keep Arroyo in power. Whereas the opposition may be accused of destabilizing, the government in power is not exactly patriotic in its actions.
Where does this leave us? You’re right. In limbo.
We cannot expect life to be fair in all its aspects at all times. But we can at least expect the administration to keep the semblance of fairness — if only to maintain a tenable facade. Sadly, we dont see this. It is said by Schopenhauer that “Beauty is an open letter of recommendation, predisposing the heart to favor the person who presents it.” R. Gonzales, the Justice Secretary, having possessed none of it, is so much the ogre by his biased pronouncements. It is difficult to like someone so disagreeable in countenance especially when he possesses a very detestable character. Imagine him speaking about judicial matters with one eyebrow raised higher than the other, with pursed lips and a sneaky mannerism that can only have risen right out of Dickens’ Bleak House Jarndice and Jarndice!
If his is the face of Justice, who wants to seek him?
And then picture Arroyo speaking before an audience. She lashes back at her opposition at every chance she gets. If she accuses the opposition of being uncooperative, noisy and saboteurs, she has to understand that she must, unwittingly, accept half the blame for it. She is not presidential and has no bearing of a forgiving leader. She opened her salvo on Lacson before the 2004 elections hoping to descredit him before the campaign begun. She did the same to FPJ during the campaign. She lashed back at her detractors on speaking engagements thinking it would score her points. It made her seem and sound like an angry housewife hoping to nag her way into the hearts of the people.
She sowed the seeds of divisiveness and was appalled to find the fruits of rancour thrown back at her.

Avatar

spellvexit

March 3rd, 2006 at 1:26 am

IF Arroyo fails to pacify this ever increasing heat of political divisiveness, she should resign. She may, for all her self-serving pronouncements, be the duly elected constitutional leader, but minus the leadership quality to rally both the administration and the opposition to a unified cause, she is, indubitably, a failure.
She has to recognize this in order to resign and make way for someone who can.
If she doesn’t and wishes to stay in Malacanan to satisfy her lust for power, she may end up as the first Philippine President who will be assassinated. This is not a threat but a very real logical conclusion to all her political maneuvering. She’s pushing the people to the limit and painting the opposition into a proverbial corner. When all legally and politically viable options have been exhausted, only assassination remains as the means to remove her from the Presidential seat.

Avatar

bluemoon

March 3rd, 2006 at 6:32 pm

Why doesn’t PCIJ investigate WHERE the pork barrel of these senators and party-list representatives go? I’m sure we’ll be reading a lot of interesting stuff.

Avatar

spellvexit

March 3rd, 2006 at 10:14 pm

Yes, i agree. Investigate the opposition as well as the administration. The administration doesnt have the monopoly on graft and corruption.

Avatar

political_nuisance12

March 4th, 2006 at 1:36 pm

I think that the Philippines is a country mostly ruled by the people’s emotions not its laws. A country with an established constitution outlining the laws of the land should abide by it. I am asking why are people so pationate about having Arroyo resign? If they want her out of power, what would be the first step if the President does not want to resign?
A proper way of dealing of an unhappy constituent would be an impeachment trial! Non of this lets protest protest crap, or lets have her assasinated. If Arroyo cannot be impeached because she has too many supporters in the house, then you protest at your representative’s offices. You tell them your oppinions and if they don’t follow the will of the people. Punish them in the next election by voting them out of office.

People in the Philippines seriously do not know how to follow protocol. I feel its the majority of the poor people who want her out, they keep complaining I’m poor, I’m poor; however that is really nobody’s fault, and most certainly not the president’s. The people of the Philippines have to start thinking with their brains not with their hearts. The people are angry, very angry, and why? Because they are poor? Because they are unemployed? Well thats an easy problem to solve! Become more competitive. What is purely happening in the Philippines is social darwinism. Survival of the fittest. If your certain skills are not needed in the market, adapt and change! And stop complaining by appearing like there is nothing you can do! There are a lot of philanthropists in the world, that are willing to help. Just seek them out.

So far Arroyo maybe the best thing that has happend to the country since independence. She has stronger ties with the American. She has a doctorate in Economics–somthing that will surely help her concieve ways of reducing the nation’s debt. Look what she has done so far, she has increased foreing investments, thus in turn providing jobs and resulting with the strengthening of the peso.

With all the protesting going on, its starting to make Philippines look bad in the eyes of the world. It is showing weakness, and political instability that is driving away investment! Help your country and support policies that will benefit the majority of the people in the LONG RUN! Well thats my two-cents on what i think about the Philippines and its politics. Lastly, I grew up most of my life in Canada, and observing the filipino political arena, makes me thankful i am here. The filipino “Crab mentality” or mentality in general has to change if it is going to succeed as a country and move towards prosperity in the capitalist world.

Avatar

spellvexit

March 4th, 2006 at 3:15 pm

Use our brains and not our hearts?
POLITICAL NUISANCE: Think about what you’ve said.

The main gripe people have about Arroyo is her cheating. The ones about life being difficult and economics poor, they’re important but not the salvo the opposition is using to kick her out of office.
As to the impeachment case that was junked, well, there goes your protocol. Ever heard of quid pro quo, NUISANCE? She broke the very laws she was supposed to execute, the NOISY opposition is merely exercising it’s freedom of expression and assembly.
political_nuisance12 said, “So far Arroyo maybe the best thing that has happend to the country since independence. She has stronger ties with the American. She has a doctorate in Economics–somthing that will surely help her concieve ways of reducing the nation’s debt. Look what she has done so far, she has increased foreing investments, thus in turn providing jobs and resulting with the strengthening of the peso.”
Re the “best thing” that is arguable. As to her doctorate degree in Economics, that has been used chiefly in manipulating the last polls.
Regarding the reduction of the country’s debts, it has ballooned to close to US$ 5B since she took office. Then as to the strengthening of the peso, she is merely the happy, coincidental beneficiary of that credit. OFW remittances are the true source of the peso’s strengthening. Not Arroyo.
I use my brain to analyze the situation. Pro Arroyo mouth-pieces use propaganda. POLITICAL_NUISANCE is clearly not an Arroyo sympathizer. Because he doesnt even possess a brain, much less capable of parroting pro-administration propaganda.
Lastly, defying a cheat who is in power shows courage. Sadly, there are not enough courageous men around to do that. Most are brainless dilettantes and selfish cretins who think Arroyo is the best thing that has happened to the Philippines simply because she has closer ties to Bush. Disregarding at all cost the nigh irreparable damage she has done to the country’s basic democratic institutions, people like POLITICAL_NUISANCE have the gall to lecture the Filipino people on sensibilty, political protocol, cultural shortcomings and capitalism. Aye, for someone whose behind is safely tucked away north of the USA, he can give all the lecture he wants and show us his righteous indignation for as long as it’s not his ass on the line.
After all, he doesnt get to be on the receiving end of a bad policy gone worse dished out by an immoral and corrupt politician.
Of course, he can be emotionally detached about the whole thing. He’s not here. And he uses his brainless head.

Avatar

jr_lad

March 5th, 2006 at 1:33 am

good comments spellvexit and good obsevations too. keep on blogging. your comments are worth reading.

Avatar

Yumina

March 5th, 2006 at 8:46 pm

First They Came for the Jews

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.

Pastor Martin Niemöller

Avatar

spellvexit

March 6th, 2006 at 1:41 pm

Perhaps more than the number of people calling for the ouster of Arroyo is the number people appealing to the opposition to forget and forgive this president’s “lapses in judgment”.
These Christians and forgiving people say that we have to move on to get ahead with our economic programs. And perhaps, economic progress will gain steam.
They say that we are back on EDSA 20 years after EDSA. That our people’s juvenile angst keeps us glued to the same sore spot in our history.
They say we have always been a people of sore losers. That we do not concede electoral contests without calling the opponents cheaters.

Then i think it is high time we capitalize on the GARCI tapes. For years we have always heard of poll protests after each election. Well, prior to 2005, we have never had the occasion to witness something as explosive and as detailed as the GARCI tapes. Let’s use these tapes and once and for all throw out the skeletons in our political closets.
While it is painful and damaging to our present state of affairs, I believe it is better than reliving this nightmare over and over in perpetuity. We must put a stop to this vicious cycle.

On the other hand, if we allow Arroyo to go scot-free, we shall be guilty of nonfeisance and worse, setting a bad precedent to those who come after her. If we can’t prosecute a president as guilty as sin, how can we expect to tell our children that cheating in school is bad? How will we explain to them that Arroyo’s cheating is not a good thing when it has apparently put her in office and kept her in power?
I sit on a school board as one of its directors. Last year, we had an incident worth mentioning here. A child of 14 was caught while cheating during a long exam. The accosted student protested during the suspension proceeding and the school board was called to mediate the affair.
His parents contended that since their child only copied 4 items when he was caught, ideally, only the corresponding points to the 4 items in question should be deducted from the exam and their child should be allowed back in class. This, the father explained, was how Mike Defensor argued for the President of the Philippines. Ergo, he expounded, if it was good enough for the President, it must also be a good enough defense for his child.
This palpable example set by the leader of our land is causing havoc in our life.

Of course, we suspended that student.
We told the erring parent that if wishes to be treated like Arroyo, he should enrol his child to be matriculated in Malacanan. We do not tolerate an Arroyo act in our institution. Thus, he cannot be another Defensor.

Avatar

jr_lad

March 6th, 2006 at 2:32 pm

“On the other hand, if we allow Arroyo to go scot-free, we shall be guilty of nonfeiasance and worse, setting a bad precedent to those who come after her. If we can’t prosecute a president as guilty as sin, how can we expect to tell our children that cheating in school is bad? How will we explain to them that Arroyo’s cheating is not a good thing when it has apparently put her in office and kept her in power?”

exactly what i’ve been saying all along spellvexit. how we are best taught and molded in school w/ equal emphasis on moral values not just the academic side. but i realized no matter how best schooled a person is, and spent 1/4 of their lives studying, all these good values learned are thrown out of the window. what matter is economics. and for what? the irony of all, to bring their children to prestigeous schools and have a better education. become successful and rich individuals someday… and also become apathetic like them.

so it has become a precedent, cheating should not be a capital offense in school anymore. if our president is caught cheating and able to get away with it, why not students. after all, he copied 4 items only. it has no effect on the total result. he still passed the exam based on his other answers, why should he plunk it and be suspended? afterall, the president, the model of the people, got scot-free. there’s the example.

Avatar

bluemoon

March 6th, 2006 at 4:18 pm

“On the other hand, if we allow Arroyo to go scot-free, we shall be guilty of nonfeiasance and worse, setting a bad precedent to those who come after her. If we can’t prosecute a president as guilty as sin, how can we expect to tell our children that cheating in school is bad? How will we explain to them that Arroyo’s cheating is not a good thing when it has apparently put her in office and kept her in power?”

If I may ask, how do you expect to tell children that accusing others of cheating, when one does not have enough proof, is bad? Maybe they should be let go scot-free, because after all, they are merely exercising their freedom of speech.

Avatar

jester-in-exile

March 6th, 2006 at 4:33 pm

bluemoon,

“how do you expect to tell children that accusing others of cheating, when one does not have enough proof, is bad?”

it IS bad, when there is absolutely no proof. this we teach our kids, don’t we? in and out of school, in and out of church? “thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor” and all?

when there is, especially in a position wherein the person should be above reproach (e.g., student council president, summa cum laude), heck, now that’s the similarity to GMA’s situation. the garci tapes exist, general gudani and colonel balutan both exist, garci exists… there is enough data coming from different sources pointing to GMA’s fraud.

in engineering, if results of tests and analyses performed independent of each other on a sample under study point to a single conclusion, occam’s razor applies — that conclusion is the correct one.

Avatar

Gurong Bayan

March 6th, 2006 at 5:56 pm

What is the differnc between teh so called leftist, rightists, and GMA..from what I see…basically nothing…..they are not actually oppose to each other..they are in the same fence scrambling for the best position to enrich themselves…

while most of us choose the less painful way of living…

Avatar

Gurong Bayan

March 6th, 2006 at 5:58 pm

What is the differnce between the so called leftist, rightists, and GMA..from what I see…basically nothing…..they are not actually oppose to each other..they are in the same fence scrambling for the best position to enrich themselves…

while most of us have to choose the less painful way of living…

Avatar

spellvexit

March 6th, 2006 at 6:31 pm

BLUEMOON:

I agree with you that in the case of insufficient or no evidence at all to support the allegations, the charged should go free. That is a truism, no argument there.
But we are not talking about a angel or an innocent babe here. In case you’ve forgotten or that it slipped your attention, the person we’re talking about here is GLORIA MACAPAGAL ARROYO, the President of the Republic of the Philippines.

True, every person charged with an offense should be accorded the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise. This holds true even for the President of our Republic.
However, inasmuch as pursuing the legal remedy in a matter of paramount national interest has been blocked by both legal and political impediments, the only remaining option, however unsavory, presents to be quite inviting.
This is why we see quotidian mass protests on the streets. I agree that the noisy opposition is indeed making the already difficult life even worse for us. However, I also understand their motivation. If they or rather we don’t expose and take drastic measures to overhaul the faulty electoral process now, we might not have another Doble and Ong who will sell the tapes in the coming elections.

As to the amount of proofs presented on mass media, Arroyo only has the slimmest of chance to emerge from this guilt-free. If i falsely accuse you, Bluemoon, of cheating, you would stake whatever you have on the line to refute it, wouldn’t you? You’d spare no efforts to prove me wrong.
Arroyo did not do that. She unleashed her congress-dogs to bark and barricade whatever advances the pro-impeachment solons did. She went on national tv to placate the troubled public but did nothing better than double-talk. Arroyo’s campaign spokesman, now secretary of DENR, Mike Defensor, voluntarily offered to prove that she is the “duly elected President” by giving away the questioned votes from key Mindanao provinces. He said that even if the ballots be transferred to FPJ, she will still lead the deceased actor by 600,000 votes.

That is a half-concession of guilt. So what if she still emerges to be the over-all winner in the tally?

Most of our countrymen miss this point.

The student in our school likewise missed it. The 4 items he cheated on was not the focal issue here. Whether they carry a weighted grade point equivalent of 10 or 100 is irrelevant in the consideration of the school board.

It is the ACT OF CHEATING that we did not tolerate. Who cares if Arroyo only fabricated or padded one vote?
The mere act of changing one (1) ballot in her favor makes her as guilty as if she changed one million (1,000,000) votes! Are we bargaining the degrees of cheating here?

SHE HOLDS THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE COUNTRY. AS SUCH, SHE SHOULD BE HELD TO A HIGHER, if not, THE HIGHEST STANDARD OF ACCOUNTABILITY.

Lastly, allowing her to stay unimpeached and the allegations of cheating unanswered, will, in the long run, create cynicism among the people (if it has not already been effected).

Who will want to go and vote (conscientiously) in the next polls knowing whatever names people put on their ballot will be subsequently changed by politicians like Arroyo anyways?

This issue goes deeper than mere economics and teaching a child of 14 about the “due process” of law. In fact, it may even be deeper than your handle, Bluemoon. Why is the moon blue?

Avatar

spellvexit

March 6th, 2006 at 6:35 pm

BLUEMOON:

I agree with you that in the case of insufficient or no evidence at all to support the allegations, the charged should go free. That is a truism, no argument there.
But we are not talking about an angel or an innocent babe here. In case you’ve forgotten or that it slipped your attention, the person we’re talking about here is GLORIA MACAPAGAL ARROYO, the President of the Republic of the Philippines.

True, every person charged with an offense should be accorded the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise. This holds true even for the President of our Republic.
However, inasmuch as pursuing the legal remedy in a matter of paramount national interest has been blocked by both legal and political impediments, the only remaining option, however unsavory, presents to be quite inviting.
This is why we see quotidian mass protests on the streets. I agree that the noisy opposition is indeed making the already difficult life even worse for us. However, I also understand their motivation. If they or rather we don’t expose and take drastic measures to overhaul the faulty electoral process now, we might not have another Doble and Ong who will sell the tapes in the coming elections.

As to the amount of proofs presented on mass media, Arroyo only has the slimmest of chance to emerge from this guilt-free. If i falsely accuse you, Bluemoon, of cheating, you would stake whatever you have on the line to refute it, wouldn’t you? You’d spare no efforts to prove me wrong.
Arroyo did not do that. She unleashed her congress-dogs to bark and barricade whatever advances the pro-impeachment solons did. She went on national tv to placate the troubled public but did nothing better than double-talk. Arroyo’s campaign spokesman, now secretary of DENR, Mike Defensor, voluntarily offered to prove that she is the “duly elected President” by giving away the questioned votes from key Mindanao provinces. He said that even if the ballots be transferred to FPJ, she will still lead the deceased actor by 600,000 votes.

That is a half-concession of guilt. So what if she still emerges to be the over-all winner in the tally?

Most of our countrymen miss this point.

The student in our school likewise missed it. The 4 items he cheated on was not the focal issue here. Whether they carry a weighted grade point equivalent of 10 or 100 is irrelevant in the consideration of the school board.

It is the ACT OF CHEATING that we did not tolerate. Who cares if Arroyo only fabricated or padded one vote?
The mere act of changing one (1) ballot in her favor makes her as guilty as if she changed one million (1,000,000) votes! Are we bargaining the degrees of cheating here?

SHE HOLDS THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE COUNTRY. AS SUCH, SHE SHOULD BE HELD TO A HIGHER, if not, THE HIGHEST STANDARD OF ACCOUNTABILITY.

Lastly, allowing her to stay unimpeached and the allegations of cheating unanswered, will, in the long run, create cynicism among the people (if it has not already been effected).

Who will want to go and vote (conscientiously) in the next polls knowing whatever names people put on their ballot will be subsequently changed by politicians like Arroyo anyways?

This issue goes deeper than mere economics and teaching a child of 14 about the “due process” of law. In fact, it may even be deeper than your handle, Bluemoon. Why is the moon blue?

Avatar

jr_lad

March 7th, 2006 at 12:18 am

“If I may ask, how do you expect to tell children that accusing others of cheating, when one does not have enough proof, is bad?”

want more proof? why did garci disappear then for 4 months? as what spellvexit just mentioned, would he (garci) not stake whatever he has on the line to refute it? Spare no efforts to prove the accussations are wrong. oh yes, he did face the prove… after 4 or 5 months. that’s a person that is not guilty to you. but if he happened to be a “leftist” like ka beltran here and others, they would have been easily wanted with a bounty on their heads. easily arrested and charged with a 21 year old sedition case that was already given amnesty by a previous president. i think your statement “Maybe they should be let go scot-free, because after all, they are merely exercising their freedom of speech” should be applied to them instead.

Avatar

scud_1975

March 7th, 2006 at 6:15 am

“Lawmakers’ funds used to topple govt”

Headline..Manila Standard TODAY. The study was made by the Ateneo-based Center for Strategic Studies led by Jesuit priest Fr. Romeo Intengan.

here’s the link..
http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/?page=news01_mar07_2006

Avatar

bluemoon

March 7th, 2006 at 2:58 pm

spellvexit,

Oh, it didn’t slip my attention that we are not talking about an angel or an innocent babe here, but about GLORIA MACAPAGAL ARROYO, the President of the Republic of the Philippines. Are you sure it did not slip yours? You seem to be confusing a deluded father’s defense of his child, who was already caught cheating, with Mike Defensor’s offer which was not even necessary as a defense given the fact that the opposition have not even managed to prove that the conversations in that tape led to any cheating—and it was a tampered tape at that.

Your posts remind me of this proverb,

If they say the moon is blue,
We must believe that it is true.

Go figure.

Avatar

kuleet ato

March 7th, 2006 at 3:00 pm

gusto ko lang sabihin sa mga pakshet na yan…if you really care para sa bansa natin…eh magbayad muna kayo ng taxes ung tama at sapat na bayad ha! tapos bago tumakbo sa edsa tanong mo sa sarili mo nagbabayad ba ako ng taxes at may karapatan ba ako dito? palaasa ba ako sa goverment? at may ginagawa ba ako para hindi umasa sa gobyerno no’to?mag isip bago magpa-uto…to my understanding eh kahit sino ilagay mo dyan sa malacanang eh mangungurakot lang yan!!!! yung iba hindi lang sila halatang magnanakaw,pati sa House of Rep ang kapal tumayo dyan at magbigay ng speech at ipagtangol ang gobyerno at awayin ang gobyerno eh ang tanong; MAY NAGAWA NA BA KAYO SA CONSISTUENT NYO!!! TSKTSKTSK….GAWA MUNA PO BAGO NGAWA! sa senado!!! please ipagpatuloy nyo po ang fertilizer scam at ang pag pasa sa juvenile justice law….God Bless the Philippines!

Avatar

Timtim2

March 7th, 2006 at 3:43 pm

Blue moon said:
“If I may ask, how do you expect to tell children that accusing others of cheating, when one does not have enough proof, is bad? Maybe they should be let go scot-free, because after all, they are merely exercising their freedom of speech.”

–> good argument there. cheating and all other accusations, “if” true are inexcusable and clear manifestation of ill-behavior. punishable. true. but, remember those who have accused someone and failed to prove it can also be punished by the law should the accused file libel charges.

Filipinos love freedom. however, we have a problem on taking responsibilities seriously. just how much will this affect the values of the next generation?

Spellvexit said:
“True, every person charged with an offense should be accorded the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.”

–> Even the ones accused of the gravest sin are given this right. If charges are filed formally, shouldn’t these be discussed at the proper forum? It’s not an excuse that just because they failed to prove it at the proper forum justifies their disobedience. Remember the time when Rene Saguisag and one opposition member (forgot his name) asked for all of us not to pay taxes to blackmail the administration. What will suffer? The economy. tsk..tsk..

Avatar

spellvexit

March 7th, 2006 at 5:50 pm

Timtim2 said,

“Even the ones accused of the gravest sin are given this right. If charges are filed formally, shouldn’t these be discussed at the proper forum? It’s not an excuse that just because they failed to prove it at the proper forum justifies their disobedience.”

——– KUDOS TO TIMTIM2.

I subscribe to your point of view without reservation on the issue of presumption of innocence and on the score of punishment for those irresponsible accusers.
No argument there.

My point regarding the incumbent president, however, is entirely different.
Your statement: “It’s not an excuse that just because they failed to prove it at the proper forum justifies their disobedience.” This is not entirely accurate. It is irresponsibly sweeping in its conclusion.

Firstly, should there be a failure on the part of the opposition or to be more inclusive, of Arroyo’s detractors, to produce probable prima facie evidence to support their allegations, then, they are indeed guilty of sabotaging national interests. But the key term in your statement is “failed to prove” which means that they were given the legal chance and appropriate venue to submit and argue their case before a jury of solons. The case was junked on technicality perpetrated with prejudice. It did not even get a day of court time.

Secondly, your choice of term in that same statement, “justifies their disobedience” is grossly unfair. Unfair in what way, you may ask. Well, disagreeing and refusal to obey have very different meanings in a democratic society like ours, Timtim.
Surely you dont expect everyone to agree to everything that comes out of Arroyo’s mouth? Surely, however much you are a fan of Arroyo, you do not expect us to believe that everything she does or says is faultless? I dont agree with her but I dont have to “disobey” her! That is because we dont obey her, we obey the law!
Dissension is disagreement. Coup d’etat — now that’s disobedience and disloyalty to the Constitution.
As to the issue of disobedience to the Chief Executive, well, you should read the treatise of “authority”.

We live in a society governed by both written and unwrit laws of social contract. The government in power was put there by the most basic right of the people, the right to suffrage.

Presently, this is a gray area. Chiefly due to the challenge issued by the opposition on her legitimacy. Thus, her claim to that presidential seat is being put to doubt, and so goes her rightful use of the power incidental to that claim.
The only way she can safely and legally silence all contests to this presidential lien is to face the impeachment squarely (not parroting repeatedly that she won the elections fairly and squarely).

Lastly, once the issue of legitimacy is legally and unequivocallly resolved, the economy will, in the words of Arroyo, “take off”. But not until then.
People who are pro Arroyo are always using the threat to economic progress as a shield to counter charges against her.

Timtim, you have to read Nietzsche’s Four Errors. You are mistaking the consequence for the cause.

The economy is suffering not because Arroyo’s detractors are noisy or belligerent, it is so because she failed to silence those who are challenging her with finality and legality.

When you wish to extinguish an electrical cord that has been short-circuited and on fire, you don’t throw water on it! You unplug it from the wall socket or from the source!

Avatar

pwidi

March 11th, 2006 at 11:18 pm

“Cooler heads prevailed and averted a congressional bloodbath.”

that would’ve been something…

Avatar

spellvexit

March 13th, 2006 at 7:12 pm

Bluemoon said:

“…Mike Defensor’s offer which was not even necessary as a defense given the fact that the opposition have not even managed to prove that the conversations in that tape led to any cheating—and it was a tampered tape at that.”

For all that legalese, there remains one fundamental flaw in your argument. There was never a chance for the opposition to prove anything because Arroyo’s allies junked the case on grounds of technicalities. Even the much ballyhooed tapes were never authenticated because (1) Arroyo would not submit to an actual voice-print analysis; (2) Garci was in hiding when the impeachment motion was being deliberated.

You are thus assigning a failure on the opposition for a fault not fundamentally theirs to begin with.

On top of all that, it must have escaped your blue mind that politics, as contradistinguished from matters that are strictly legal, is a matter of perception and good faith.

The social contract between government and it’s people is based on the electorate’s perception of the person they are voting into office. It is therefore incumbent upon the elected official to act in good faith as a fulfillment of that unwrit social contract.

This agreement, Bluemoon, carries with it not just an abstract contract but also the hopes and aspirations of the electorate participating in the basic democratic process. In our case, this agreement has been shamelessly broken.

As such, with every opposition member crying foul, Arroyo has to clear the air of suspicions and other unwanted conjectures about her mandate and official lien. This she did not do. Not failed to do, but DID NOT DO or WOULD NOT DO.
She may well have that legal right. But her refusal to address and clear the issues renders her claims even more suspect.

As to the case of the “deluded father” defending his son, well, I am sorry. Mike Defensor’s defense was to cede the contested votes to show that Arroyo will still emerge the victor in the last polls. That argument, is the crux of my analogy.

His willingness to concede on the grounds of heated allegations caused this poor parent to adopt it as his defense for his errant child. That example, granting that this parent was not intelligent enough to see that it is a poor model to adopt, remains a palpable precedent.

Lastly, I do not totally subscribe to the general opinion just because it is the general opinon. If they all say that the moon is blue, let them say it is. Neither do I think it is nor do i have to, anyway. However, I do think that your colors are indeed of a bluish hue.

Arroyo likes to wear blue, doesn’t she?

And of course, the moon by its original latin term is associated with LUNACY or madness, is it not?

Avatar

pwidi

March 13th, 2006 at 11:31 pm

spellvexit: “Then as to the strengthening of the peso, she is merely the happy, coincidental beneficiary of that credit. OFW remittances are the true source of the peso’s strengthening. Not Arroyo.”

how true. and in fact, i think the peso strengthened despite arroyo.

and about cheating… i thought it was common (albeit sickening) knowledge that ALL (or at least a big majority of) politicians cheat (which of course does not make the act of cheating right).

and if i may, a call for … katinuhan. if we must, let us attack the person’s opinion, not ther person him/herself.

Avatar

Spolarium

March 16th, 2006 at 6:17 pm

Only one thing for sure the primary cause of all this mess is “GloriaGate Scandal”.

Avatar

spellvexit

March 16th, 2006 at 11:01 pm

Spolarium said:

“Only one thing for sure the primary cause of all this mess is “GloriaGate Scandal”

—- Allow me to move the chain of causality by another notch, or perhaps onto it’s primordial cause: Gloria M Arroyo.

The bell does not and will not sound unless someone rings it. Tolstoy wrote in War and Peace, “a thousand horses do not make a zebra.”

No amount of false accusation will make what’s right, wrong.

Conversely, no amount of “Bunye-ing” will cover Arroyo’s farts.

Avatar

jr_lad

March 17th, 2006 at 12:20 am

common na kung common about cheating. we all agree that it’s rampant and we all say it’s not right but we really cannot do anything about it. what is uncommon is, someone’s got caught and we still want to condone it. glue-ria got caught (courtesy of her own people) and she admitted it and even said sorry but we still want to justify the act as a common thing. hide the truth behind technicalities. yan ang mahirap lunukin.

Avatar

MitaMS

March 17th, 2006 at 12:53 am

may bago nang balita…magpapakabait na daw opposition at gagawin na nila assignment nila…tuloy ang impeachment. Suportahan natin sila…
para naman sulit ang botong natanggap nila (nandaya man o hindi – hindi ko alam) at para sulit din benefits at privilege na kasalukuyan nilang tinatanggap (yun ang sigurado).

Avatar

Zafiro

March 18th, 2006 at 12:01 am

It’s kind of amusing to read the earlier blogs. Mukhang matatalino lahat at may sari-sariling opinyon. Kaya lang sa mga palitan ng kuro-kuro eh lumilitaw pa rin ang immaturity ng ilan. Kapag hindi ma-iparating ang mensahe eh pine-personal ang usapan at nagbibigay ng mga salitang “simpleton”, “naive”, “bozo”. Huwag naman sanang ganito. Hindi naman kailangan ang insulting words sa isang masaganang usapan.

Tungkol sa issue ng clampdown na ginagawa ng Arroyo administration against the so-called subversives, ito’y isang malaking kamalian during peaceful times. Wala namang maliwanag na dahilan para gawin ang mga ito at maliwanag na sumusugal lang si Gloria. Ang state of emergency ay ginawa lang nila upang mag-karoon ng semblance of legality at ng makita nilang hindi pala magki-click eh biglang binawi. Sana ay madagdagan pa tayo ng maraming Rene Saguisag na patuloy na nagtatanong at nagtatanggol sa issue ng civil liberties.

Comment Form